Government Contracts & Grants

We help contractors navigate the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and agency supplements to ensure compliance and address potential issues before expensive investigations, litigation, and attendant reputational damage arise.

We have extensive experience prosecuting and defending bid protests at the pre- and post-award stages before various state and local entities, federal agencies, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Federal Claims Court, and the Federal Circuit. Our creativity and attention to detail often enable us to find successful supplemental protest grounds as we review the agency’s procurement record. We add value to every bid-protest representation, not only by zealously advocating the legal issues in favor of our clients, but also by understanding our clients’ relationships with the relevant government agencies. This ensures our guidance will be based on our clients’ business and legal goals.

Our attorneys are experienced in handling claims and disputes against the government, claims under the False Claims Act (FCA), and other anti-fraud statutes. We have experience in all aspects of the contract dispute process, including pre-claim counseling, claim preparation, requests for equitable adjustment (REAs), settlement discussions and negotiations, and claim litigation. We have resolved contract disputes across a range of industry sectors. We have successfully litigated Contract Disputes Act cases before the Civilian and Armed Services Boards of Contract Appeals and Federal Claims Court.

We regularly counsel private-sector, for-profit, and non-profit clients regarding federal grant counseling, compliance, and termination issues. We have experience in all aspects of the federal grant process, from pre-application, application, award, ongoing compliance and reporting, to challenging grant terminations based on alleged default and non-alignment with Administration priorities. We have represented grantees of numerous federal programs under the NIH, DOD, DOE, EPA, VA, and other federal agencies.

Our team regularly collaborates with the firm’s global corporate lawyers in the sale, purchase or restructuring of businesses that hold or bid on federal and state government contracts. Our breadth of experience permits us to look for and identify the unique regulatory compliance risks associated with government contractors. We have advised clients on anti-assignment prohibitions, novation requirements, backlog valuation, audits and/or investigations, claims or disputes, intellectual property rights, and the requirements for review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Our team includes attorneys with top-secret clearances who can assist with classified contracts and Foreign Ownership, and Control (FOCI) documents.

We regularly assist clients with both day-to-day compliance issues and internal investigations for potential compliance violations. When investigations are necessary, we have a team of experienced attorneys who conduct internal investigations, collect and review documents, interview witnesses, provide advice on voluntary disclosure of potential procurement issues, and engage in settlement negotiations for clients.

We have assisted numerous clients in responding to federal government investigations into alleged criminal and civil violations, including claims under the FCA, Sarbanes-Oxley, civil and criminal false statements, and anti-corruption and whistleblower claims. We have skillfully represented clients in this constantly changing area of the law, whether or not such representation included litigation and/or settlement. We have extensive experience conducting document collection, review, and production, as well as negotiating the scope and terms of government subpoenas and requests for information. We have successfully presented information and arguments to discourage government intervention, negotiated potential settlements, and litigated FCA suits against the DOJ and qui tam relators’ counsel.

We have recovered billions of dollars for clients owed money by the federal government under a variety of statutes. This litigation involves forums such as the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, and the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.

We have represented Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) in state-level Medicaid Managed Care Procurements. We have defended awards and successfully challenged awards for these multi-billion-dollar procurements, which are often the largest contracts at the state level.

We have experience successfully responding to concerns raised by agency suspension and debarment officials. We have assisted clients in preparing, submitting, and presenting written information and argument in opposition to show cause notices relating to possible debarment or suspension. Our team has been successful in either demonstrating the current responsibility of our clients or negotiating with government officials to facilitate agreements for our clients to avoid debarment or suspension.

We help clients in drafting REAs to recover monies owed for government changes to contracts. We have experience resolving the REAs with the government before initiating the Contract Disputes Act claims process.

We are experienced in performing contract reviews at both the contract-formation and contract-administration stages of government acquisitions. During the contract-formation stage, we provide expert review of government solicitations. In the contract-administration stage, we focus on interpreting government contracts and providing clients with advice that fosters compliance or raises issues of potential claims or disputes against the government. Additionally, our attorneys assist clients in drafting, negotiating, and interpreting government subcontracting agreements.

Our attorneys assist clients in drafting, negotiating, and interpreting subcontracts, teaming agreements, and joint ventures. We also handle litigation related to these agreements.

We represent our client in both types of terminations relevant to government contracting—terminations for default and terminations for convenience. We have successfully convinced government agencies to convert terminations for default into no-cost terminations for convenience, and we have assisted with drafting termination for convenience settlement proposals and litigating resultant claims, as necessary, to receive compensation for our clients for the termination-sparked economic harm.

We regularly assist clients with both day-to-day compliance issues and internal investigations for potential compliance violations. We assist clients in understanding the scope and content of federal regulations to which they are subject.

We advise clients on ownership of intellectual property created using federal funds and compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act, as well as Buy America requirements imposed on various funding programs. We also work closely with other firm attorneys to meet the specialized cybersecurity and data-protection needs of defense, aerospace, healthcare, maritime, and technology companies globally that do business with the federal government at all points in the supply chain.

We advise clients on ownership of intellectual property created using federal funds and compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act, as well as Buy America requirements imposed on various funding programs.

Our attorneys regularly counsel funds seeking Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) licenses through the entire licensing process and advise them on SBIC regulatory compliance matters throughout their life cycles. Our SBIC attorneys are known as the “go to” attorneys in the SBIC regulatory world. We have extensive experience working with SBICs and serve our clients in all stages of a fund’s life—from inception through liquidation. We also handle size appeals at the Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals, including all issues related to affiliation and small business size, HUBZone, and 8(a) status.