Investigations, Enforcement, & Compliance Alerts

On November 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense announced a comprehensive overhaul of its procurement strategy named the “Acquisition Transformation Strategy” (ATS). The ATS envisions a wartime-oriented process that aims to prioritize rapid fielding to get equipment into the hands of warfighters, industrial-base expansion, and tighter coupling of requirements, resourcing, and acquisition execution. The accompanying directives signal a consequential restructuring of U.S. defense acquisition, requirements, and security cooperation processes as the Department aims to disestablish legacy joint requirements governance in favor of an integrated, budget-aligned model that is focused on speed, accountability, and mission outcomes. The new “Warfighting Acquisition System” will replace the existing “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System,” creating both new opportunities and risks for federal contractors as they navigate shifting compliance expectations and material risk exposures in all aspects of the defense acquisitions process, including budget overruns, timely performance, and exportability of next-generation platforms. 

On October 15, 2025, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska (the Court) dismissed Pharos Capital Group and its related investment funds (Pharos Capital) from a qui tam or whistleblower suit brought under the antiretaliation provision of the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3730(h)) (the FCA), against Pharos Capital and Charter Health Care Group (Charter), a portfolio company of Pharos Capital.

On September 10, 2025, the Department of Defense (DoD) published its long-awaited final DFARS rule on the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program.

DOJ False Claims Act (FCA) settlements related to cybersecurity typically have focused on false representations by a government contractor of its compliance with cybersecurity requirements. A recently announced settlement shows that private equity owners are not immune from potential FCA liability.

The long-anticipated guidance released by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on June 9, 2025 (the Guidelines) reorients Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement, shifting the DOJ’s focus to more centrally controlled, national-interest-driven anti-corruption misconduct. Below is an overview of the background and salient shifts driven by the Guidelines.

On May 22, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kousisis v. United States, holding that the government need not prove an intent to cause economic loss, let alone actual economic loss, in order to sustain a conviction for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. 

Given the recent changes the Trump Administration has made at the Department of Justice (DOJ),many people have wondered when a formal change to the DOJ’s white-collar prosecution policies, particularly the corporate self-disclosure policy, might come. During remarks at a Financial Crimes Conference on May 12, Matthew Galeotti, the new Head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, announced some of the changes to the DOJ’s policies, starting with the new commitment to be less “heavy-handed with the stick, and [less] stingy with the carrot.”  

The annual False Claims Act (FCA) recovery statistics issued by the U.S. Department of Justice for Fiscal Year 2024, coupled with the Trump administration’s focus on the elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending and apparent intentions to rely on the FCA to pursue other administration priorities, signal a likely increase in FCA investigations and actions throughout 2025 and beyond.

On April 15, 2025, President Trump issued two Executive Orders directed at streamlining government procurement.

Cybersecurity requirements for contractors doing business with the U.S. federal government are nothing new. 

On March 14, 2025, in a late Friday decision, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that, for the time being, the Trump Administration is permitted to enforce Executive Orders (EOs) 14151 (Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing) and 14173 (Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity), which prohibit Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) (also referred to as Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility, or DEIA in the EOs) efforts within the federal government and by federal contractors, respectively.

On February 15, 2025, the acting administrator of the United States General Services Administration (GSA), Stephen Ehikian, announced on X (formerly Twitter) that the GSA issued several new deviations from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) intended to implement key Trump Executive Orders that aim to end illegal discrimination, restore merit-based opportunity, and eliminate the forced use of paper straws in procurement.

On February 5, 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi issued two memoranda to all Department of Justice (DOJ) employees outlining the DOJ’s new policies and directives concerning diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEI) initiatives. The recent directives come just two weeks after President Trump issued Executive Order 14173 (Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity) (DEI EO), which reflect the new administration’s broader efforts to curtail DEI policies and initiatives within both the public and private sectors.

The early days of the Trump Administration have caused nothing less than a complete shake-up of the federal procurement system, with impacts on federal contractors, subcontractors, and recipients of federal financial assistance, such as grants and loans. Through a series of Executive Orders and Agency Memoranda issued by the heads of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), General Services Administration (GSA), Department of State, and others, the government is suspending work and, in some cases, terminating federal awards. For example, GSA issued a complete “Acquisition Pause,” the State Department issued a pause on U.S. foreign assistance funded by or through the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and is actively terminating contracts and grants, and other agencies, including Department of Energy, Veterans’ Affairs, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and National Institute of Health are issuing stop-work orders and/or termination of contracts and grants, in whole or in part.

On January 15, 2025, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council issued a proposed cybersecurity rule to implement the National Archives and Records Administration’s (NARA) Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Program across all federal agencies.  This Proposed Rule (Proposed Rule) will impose requirements on all federal contractors that are substantially similar to those that DOD contractors and subcontractors have wrestled with for many years.

On January 21, 2025, President Trump issued a sweeping executive order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (EO). The EO targets diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEI) programs in the public and the private sectors. The EO signals that organizations receiving federal funds, whether through government contracts or otherwise, may be liable under the False Claims Act (FCA)—one of the government’s most powerful anti-fraud enforcement tools providing for treble damages and steep penalties—if they maintain what the EO refers to as “illegal” DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. Significantly, the EO includes provisions that are likely to make it easier to establish FCA violations.

On January 27, 2025, the White House published Memorandum M-25-13, titled “Temporary Pause of Agency Grant, Loan, and Other Financial Assistance Programs.” In an unprecedented move, the initial Memo appeared to suspend all funding for all federal grants, cooperative agreements, noncash contributions or donations of property, direct appropriations, food commodities, other financial assistance, loans, loan guarantees, interest subsidies, and insurance that may be implicated by his executive orders. Amidst a national outcry in response to the memorandum, OMB released a subsequent Memorandum on January 28, 2025, in which OMB appeared to walk back the broad freeze on most federal financial assistance. We summarize here the details of the Memos well as the rights and remedies of recipients that may be affected by this action.

On December 16, 2024, the European Union (EU) adopted a fifteenth package of restrictive measures against Russia. This new package introduces a range of measures aimed at tightening restrictions on Russia’s military and industrial capabilities, curbing circumvention of existing sanctions, and enhancing protections for European businesses operating in increasingly complex environments.

Since well before the November 6 election, President-elect Trump and his team have been discussing the imposition of tariffs on certain trade partners. The scope of possibilities range from all imports being subject to a 10% to 20% additional tariff, to the imposition of a 60% tariff on imports from China, to tariffs on vehicles from Mexico reaching as high as 100% to 200%.

Recent enforcement actions targeting a CEO, CFO, and an audit committee chair underscores the SEC's focus on gatekeeper accountability.