WacoWatch

For the third day of the jury trial in VLSI Technologies v. Intel II, VLSI closed its case-in-chief with its damages expert, Dr. Ryan Sullivan, who valued VLSI’s damages at $3B using hedonic regression in his analysis, similar to his approach in the first trial.

Winston’s Michael Tomasulo and economist and damages expert Dr. Alan Cox unpack VLSI's use of hedonic regression, which was used to support its $2.2B damages claim in the VLSI v. Intel patent jury trial.