small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. WacoWatch

Podcast

Hedonic Regression — The Theory Behind the $2.2B Verdict in the VLSI Technologies v. Intel Case

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Podcast

Hedonic Regression — The Theory Behind the $2.2B Verdict in the VLSI Technologies v. Intel Case

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Related Locations

Los Angeles

Related Topics

Podcast
Patent Damages
Jury Trial

Related Capabilities

Patent Litigation
Intellectual Property
Technology, Media & Telecommunications

Related Regions

North America

April 2, 2021

Winston’s former partner and economist and damages expert Dr. Alan Cox unpack VLSI’s use of hedonic regression, which was used to support its $2.2B damages claim in the VLSI v. Intel patent jury trial. Dr. Cox review hedonic regressions, discuss how they have been used in antitrust cases, how VLSI used them to determine patent damages, and how the verdict might be attacked by Intel.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising