small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Insights & News

Client Alert

Pennsylvania Superior Court Rejects Non-Compete: Rules Agreement With Existing Employee Needs Additional Consideration

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Client Alert

Pennsylvania Superior Court Rejects Non-Compete: Rules Agreement With Existing Employee Needs Additional Consideration

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Less Than 1 Min Read

Related Locations

Charlotte
Chicago
Houston
Los Angeles
New York
Paris
San Francisco
Washington, DC

Related Topics

Non-Compete

Related Capabilities

Labor & Employment

Related Regions

Europe
North America

May 16, 2014

In a case of first impression, a Pennsylvania Superior Court has held that non-competition agreements entered into by an existing employee will be unenforceable unless the employee receives additional benefits in return. Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA Inc., 1223 MDA 2013.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Derek G. Barella

Shane Blackstone

Joan Fife

Deborah S.K. Jagoda

Laura Petroff

Michael Roche

Stephen Sheinfeld

Cardelle Spangler

William Sunkel

Emilie Woodhead

Derek G. Barella

Shane Blackstone

Joan Fife

Deborah S.K. Jagoda

Laura Petroff

Michael Roche

Stephen Sheinfeld

Cardelle Spangler

William Sunkel

Emilie Woodhead

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising