small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
Site Search
  • Professionals (243)
  • Capabilities (63)
  • Experience (15)
  • Insights & News (898)
  • Other Results (33)

Professionals 243 results

Lawrence “Larry” Block
Lawrence “Larry” Block
Partner
  • Washington, DC
Email
+1 202-282-5037
vCard

Partner

  • Washington, DC
Lawrence S. Sher
Lawrence S. Sher
Partner
  • Washington, DC
Email
+1 202-282-5022
vCard

Partner

  • Washington, DC
Elizabeth Leavy
Elizabeth Leavy
Partner
  • Washington, DC
Email
+1 202-282-5026
vCard

Partner

  • Washington, DC
View All Professionals

Capabilities 63 results

Industry

Government Contracts & Grants

Winston & Strawn’s Government Contracts & Grants Practice is a nationally recognized, highly regarded group of lawyers with deep experience in handling high-value, and often contentious, government contract disputes, bid protests, and claims across a broad spectrum of industries and issues. Our team also counsels clients on significant regulatory, compliance, and transactional matters—predominantly private equity and M&A deals....Read more

Industry

Media & Entertainment

For decades, Winston has filled a unique niche in the media and entertainment industry, and we continue to be at the forefront of today’s most important and challenging cases. Our interdisciplinary team advises some of the world’s most prominent industry players—studios, production companies, entertainers, artists, athletes, other celebrities, and other sector participants—in connection with the disputes and deals that are moving this dynamic industry forward....Read more

Practice Area

Commercial Litigation & Disputes

Winston represents clients in virtually every type of dispute that could arise from operating a business. While our primary objective is to protect our clients from the need to engage in litigation and enter the courtroom, we take pride in our heavyweight litigation experience and the knowledge that corporate America has repeatedly retained us not just for “bet-the-company” trials, but for “bet-the-industry” cases as well. Our commercial litigators’ track record of success earned the team a national Tier 1 ranking in Best Law Firms® 2025. Our practice is anchored by seasoned litigators, many of whom have been recognized by in-house counsel and their peers as top practitioners in their fields....Read more

Experience 15 results

Experience

|

January 24, 2025

Acquisition of Glendale Senior Dining, Inc.

Winston represented Whitsons Culinary Group, a portfolio company of GenNx360 providing customized dining services, in its acquisition of Glendale Senior Dining, Inc., a provider of contract food management services to senior living and long-term care communities throughout Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont and Maine. The acquisition of Glendale Senior Dining allows Whitsons Culinary Group to expand its services to encompass senior living and long-term care communities in the highly strategic New England region....Read more

Experience

|

June 6, 2023

Forge Nano Raises US$50M to Build Out Battery Production Line to Meet Growing Demand for Premium Batteries

Winston & Strawn LLP represented Forge Nano (the Company), a global leader in precision nano-coating technology in a US$50+M funding led by key investments from Korea’s Hanwha Corporate Venture Capital with participation from OIC, Catalus Capital, Ascent Funds, and existing investors. This funding brings the Company’s total amount of capital raised to date to more than US$95M. The financing will allow Forge Nano to capitalize on its already growing commercial-scale nanotechnology opportunities for battery material as well as develop a battery production line to satisfy full-scale, premium battery contracts. Plans are underway to launch construction of the pilot battery production line in Q2 2023 that will support applications including aerospace, consumer electronics, defense, and more....Read more

Experience

|

May 5, 2023

Secured Pivotal Summary Judgment Win for Pioneer Natural Resources in Force Majeure Case

In February 2023, we secured a major win for Pioneer Natural Resources on summary judgment in a high-stakes breach of contract case brought by MIECO LLC, alleging failure to supply natural gas during Winter Storm Uri. Two weeks before the trial was set to begin in the Northern District of Texas, Judge Jane Boyle granted our summary judgment motion after finding the contractual language of the force majeure provision unambiguous. Specifically, the judge found Pioneer’s non-delivery was excused by force majeure because its loss of gas supply was due to the low temperatures that affected an entire geographic region, even though MIECO had argued Pioneer could have purchased and delivered the gas from other sources....Read more
View All Experience

Insights & News 898 results

Client Alert

|

October 6, 2025

|

1 Min Read

California Limits Contractor Retention to Five Percent

Starting in 2026, California will cap retention in private construction contracts at 5%, matching public works standards. The rule excludes non-mixed-use residential projects under four stories and applies across all contractor-subcontractor levels. Lower retention rates for direct contractors will extend to subcontractors. Advocates say that the cap will ease financial strain, especially for smaller firms. Owners may respond with stricter bonding requirements, potentially raising construction costs due to reduced protection against non-performance.

Winston will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as they become available. Please contact your Winston relationship partner should you have any questions or to request further information.

Direct Sellers Update: Regulation, Law & Policy

|

September 30, 2025

|

5 Min Read

Are Your Electronic Agreements Enforceable?

In today’s digital marketplace, direct sellers rely heavily on electronic agreements to govern their relationships with customers, vendors, and partners. But whether these electronic agreements are enforceable depends, at least in part, on how your policies and other terms are presented to users and the way assent is obtained. Courts scrutinize these issues closely, emphasizing that even minor design choices can make the difference between a binding electronic agreement and an unenforceable set of terms.

Capital Markets & Securities Law Watch

|

September 25, 2025

|

5 Min Read

SEC Issues Policy Statement on Mandatory Arbitration Provisions and Acceleration of Registration Statement Effectiveness

On September 17, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) released a policy statement (the Policy Statement) addressing its approach to mandatory arbitration provisions in the governing documents of companies intending to go public (each, an Issuer).

View All Insights & News

Other Results 33 results

Site Content

What Is a Federal Contract?

A federal contract is a binding contract or agreement with an authorized official of any agency or department of the U.S. Government for the purpose of purchasing goods, products or services of any kind, or purchasing, renting, or leasing property, for the direct use or benefit of the U.S. Government. Federal contracts are the procurement mechanism the U.S. Government uses to obtain such goods, products, services, and property across all sectors and industries. Federal contracts may be express or implied and may be of various different types, e.g., fixed-price, cost-reimbursement, time and materials, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ). ...Read more

Site Content

Government Contracts & National Security Policies

Site Content

What Is a Bid Protest?

A bid protest is a challenge to the government’s proposed contract award for the procurement of goods and services, or a challenge to the terms of a solicitation for such a contract. A bid protest at the federal level is typically heard at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) but can also be directed to the procuring federal agency, and in certain instances, to the Court of Federal Claims (COFC). Since there are strict timelines for filing a bid protest, it is imperative to consult with counsel. See 4 C.F.R. § 21.2; see also Bid Protests At GAO: A Descriptive Guide (Ninth Edition, 2009). A bid protest is further described at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 33.103; 33.104; and 33.105....Read more
Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising