Professionals 579 results
Capabilities 85 results
Practice Area
prowess in and understanding of the insurance industry encompasses not only its products, practices, and services, but also the increasing challenges posed
by a world increasingly characterized by a fast-evolving technological landscape as well as financial, political, and environmental instability. Accor...Read more
Practice Area
litigators based in the U.S.’s busiest jurisdictions—including courts in California, Florida, Illinois, New York, and Texas—we have deep experience and prowess
in handling some of the most high-profile and business-essential advertising cases in recent history. These disputes have involved false advertisin...Read more
Practice Area
seasoned litigators who leverage extensive courtroom experience to meet our clients’ business and legal objectives. Our long history of taking cases to
trial—and winning—provides our clients with tremendous settlement leverage with their adversaries, as well as a substantial likelihood of a favor...Read more
Experience 51 results
Experience
|April 30, 2025
Experience
|March 31, 2025
Experience
|March 18, 2025
Insights & News 3,843 results
Government Program Fraud, False Claims Act & Qui Tam Litigation Playbook
|May 22, 2025
|2 Min Read
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has signaled that it will use the False Claims Act (FCA) as a tool against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies that discriminate against certain groups.
Investigations, Enforcement, & Compliance Alerts
|May 20, 2025
|10 Min Read
Rebalancing the Sticks and the Carrots? A New DOJ White-Collar Enforcement Plan
Given the recent changes the Trump Administration has made at the Department of Justice (DOJ),many people have wondered when a formal change to the DOJ’s white-collar prosecution policies, particularly the corporate self-disclosure policy, might come. During remarks at a Financial Crimes Conference on May 12, Matthew Galeotti, the new Head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, announced some of the changes to the DOJ’s policies, starting with the new commitment to be less “heavy-handed with the stick, and [less] stingy with the carrot.”
Client Alert
|May 20, 2025
|2 Min Read
In an unusual order recently issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the ITC vacated an ALJ’s Final Initial Determination (ID) on sub-prongs (A) and (B) of the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, finding error in his decision to exclude investments made prior to issuance of the asserted patents. In Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, the ALJ had found infringement, validity, and satisfaction of the technical prong, but he recommended no exclusion order solely because certain of the complainant’s investments under sub-prongs (A) and (B) were incurred prior to the issue date of the asserted patents. See Inv. No. 337-TA-1392, Comm’n Order at 2 (May 16, 2025). That decision broke from over a decade of precedent, the ITC’s order explained.
Other Results 97 results
Law Glossary
What Is Advertising Litigation?
corporate competitors based on the Lanham Act—a law that specifically deals with false advertising. The Act outlines how an advertisement can be deemed
false. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the ability to file lawsuits to halt deceptive advertising claims. The U.S. Food and Drug Administrat...Read more
Law Glossary
What Are the Patent Litigation Differences Between the BPCIA and Hatch-Waxman Act?
relate to patent litigation.