Site Search
Professionals 658 results
Capabilities 85 results
Practice Area
Our nationally recognized Appellate & Critical Motions (ACM) Practice delivers sophisticated legal advocacy and analysis before trial, at trial, and on appeal. From state trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, our ACM attorneys identify, preserve, and present the critical legal issues that can make the difference between winning and losing.
Practice Area
Trial skills matter—even in a world where few disputes ever see the inside of a courtroom. Winston has built a reputation as a trial lawyers’ firm, featuring seasoned litigators who leverage extensive courtroom experience to meet our clients’ business and legal objectives. Our long history of taking cases to trial—and winning—provides our clients with tremendous settlement leverage with their adversaries, as well as a substantial likelihood of a favorable resolution if, and when, they go to trial.
Practice Area
Winston & Strawn’s private equity attorneys provide strategic advice and legal counsel to middle-market private equity funds, hedge funds, family offices, real estate funds, alternative asset managers, portfolio companies, and institutional investors. We have one of the broadest and most active national middle-market private equity practices in the U.S.
Experience 94 results
Experience
|February 13, 2024
Experience
|January 18, 2024
Winston Represented MCE Holdings in its Acquisition of Piedmont Electric Motor Repair
Insights & News 4,664 results
Sponsorship
|May 7, 2024
Winston & Strawn Sponsors 2024 IP Counsel Café Meeting
Winston & Strawn is proud to sponsor the IP Counsel Café Annual Meeting in Silicon Valley, California, from May 7-9, 2024. Partners attending include Robert Kang, Mike Rueckheim, and Saranya Raghavan.
Sponsorship
|May 2, 2024
Beyond the Finish Line: Navigating IPOs and M&A
Is your organization racing towards an IPO or M&A transaction, but unsure on how to navigate the strategic, financial, accounting, or legal processes?
Client Alert
|April 25, 2024
|3 Min Read
SCOTUS “Lowers the Bar” for Title VII Job Transfer Claims
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States held that employees alleging they were subjected to discriminatory job transfers under Title VII need only show that they suffered some harm from the forced transfer, but, notably, the alleged harm need not be significant. In a unanimous decision, the Court in Muldrow v. St. Louis resolved a circuit split regarding the precise standard to be applied when a plaintiff alleges her job transfer amounted to an adverse employment action sufficient to support an unlawful discrimination claim.
Other Results 53 results
Site Content
Site Content