
Michael Kimberly
Partner
Co-Chair, Appellate and Critical Motions Practice
Let's Connect
Michael Kimberly heads the Firm’s Appellate and Critical Motions practice. He has argued more than 50 appeals in federal and state courts all across the country in matters of constitutional, administrative, ERISA, antitrust, criminal, banking, taxation, copyright, trademark, and labor and employment law. Michael’s appellate experience includes ten arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, four arguments before the federal courts of appeals sitting en banc, and scores of additional arguments before every regional federal court of appeals and several state supreme courts. Across the 50-plus appeals that he has argued, all in private practice, Michael’s win record is better than two-for-three.
Key Matters
Some of the experience represented below may have been handled at a previous firm.
Recent Appellate Victories
- Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp., 146 S. Ct. 854 (2026) – secured a 9-0 Supreme Court decision holding that public corporations like NJ Transit are not “arms of the state” entitled to interstate sovereign immunity
- Hewitt v. United States, 606 U.S. 419 (2025) – secured a surprise 5-4 Supreme Court victory in a criminal sentencing case that turned on detailed statutory text arguments
- Nia v. Bank of America, --- F.4th ---, 2026 WL 981207 (9th Cir. 2026) – successfully defended summary judgment in a case concerning bank compliance policies adopted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act
- Boyette v. Montefiore Medical Center, 2025 WL 48108 (2d Cir. 2025) – successfully defended dismissal of ERISA breach-of-fiduciary-duty class action on standing and pleading grounds
- Chamber of Commerce v. Lierman, 151 F.4th 530 (4th Cir. 2025); 90 F.4th 679 (4th Cir. 2024) – obtained repeat reversals and ultimate victory in a First Amendment challenge to a “no stating the tax” law
- Medical Imaging Technology Association v. Library of Congress, 103 F.4th 830 (D.C. Cir. 2024) – successfully established that the Library of Congress is subject to suit under the APA
- Appvion Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. Buth, 99 F.4th 928 (7th Cir. 2024) – successfully defended dismissal of an ERISA breach-of-fiduciary duty class action
- Matter of Comptroller of Maryland, 328 A.3d 811 (Md. App. Ct. 2024) – retained by Potomac Edison to successfully appeal a tax court decision worth $10 million annually
- Scott v. University of Chicago Medical Center, 107 F.4th 752 (7th Cir. 2024) – successfully defended the dismissal of a complaint concerning compelled vaccinations in the maternity ward
- Medicaid & Medicare Advantage Products Association v. Emanuelli Hernandez, 58 F.4th 5 (1st Cir. 2023) – successfully defended invalidation of state law under Medicare preemption
- BDO USA, LLP v. Jia-Sobota, 283 A.3d 699 (D.C. 2022) – obtained reversal of a denial of a motion to compel arbitration on waiver grounds
- Louisiana Independent Pharmacies Association v. Express Scripts, 41 F.4th 473 (5th Cir. 2022) – successfully defended dismissal of a reverse-preemption suit on jurisdictional grounds
- Virginia Hospital & Healthcare Association v. Kimsey, 2022 WL 604049 (4th Cir. 2022) – obtained reversal of the dismissal of a Medicaid preemption and Takings Clause case
Recent Regulatory Litigation Victories
- Medicaid & Medicare Advantage Products Association v. Vega (D.P.R. 2026 & 2023) – following victory in the First Circuit in 58 F.4th 5 (1st Cir. 2023), obtained two additional victories invalidating, under Medicare preemption, various state-law enforcement efforts by the Puerto Rico Insurance Commissioner
- Americans for Beneficiary Choice v. DHHS, 2024 WL 3297527 (N.D. Tex. 2024) – obtained preliminary injunction against enforcement of the Medicare Compensation Rule
- International Fresh Produce Association v. DOL, – F. Supp. 3d – (S.D. Miss. 2024) – obtained preliminary injunction on preclusion grounds against a farm worker union rights regulation
- Wild Virginia v. Council on Environmental Quality, 56 F.4th 281 (4th Cir. 2022) – intervened for trade groups in defense of favorable regulation, successfully obtaining dismissal of the suit