small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Insights & News

In the Media

Sean Wieber Discusses the Department of Homeland Security’s Facial Recognition Proposal with Legaltech News

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

In the Media

Sean Wieber Discusses the Department of Homeland Security’s Facial Recognition Proposal with Legaltech News

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Locations

Chicago

Related Topics

Regulated Personal Information (RPI)
Biometric Information
Biometrics
CCPA

Related Capabilities

Privacy: Regulated Personal Information (RPI)
Litigation/Trials
Class Actions & Group Litigation
Commercial Litigation & Disputes
Technology, Media & Telecommunications
Health Care

Related Regions

North America

December 9, 2019

The Department of Homeland Security recently withdrew a proposal it made that would have expanded airport face scans to passengers arriving in or leaving the U.S. to include American citizens. While states have laws like the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) and the forthcoming California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) to address the way personal information is handled, DHS seemed to withdraw the proposal as a response to the public's reaction versus a legal reason.

Winston & Strawn Litigation Partner Sean Wieber doesn’t expect the topic of facial recognition to disappear any time soon. “This is not even the tip of the iceberg…This is a next two [or] three-decade issue that is only going to become more pervasive as the technologies change,” he said.

Additionally, if the DHS were to successfully revisit the proposal, Sean doesn’t see any legal challenges standing in the way, as federal mandates carry more weight than state privacy regulations.

“[BIPA] only applies to private entities and they specifically exempt state or local government agencies…I don’t think legislators ever really tried to regulate the federal government in this space,” Sean said.

Read more from Sean in the full Legaltech News article. (Subscription required.)

Visit Winston’s Regulated Personal Information page to learn more about Winston’s practical approach to privacy laws.

 

 

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Sean G. Wieber

Sean G. Wieber

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising