small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Experience

Insight

Supreme Court of Illinois Decision has Implications on Use of Expert Witness

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Insight

Supreme Court of Illinois Decision has Implications on Use of Expert Witness

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Less Than 1 Min Read

Related Capabilities

Appellate & Critical Motions

Secured a new trial for a pro bono client accused of murdering his wife in a decision that will have major implications for the use of expert witnesses in criminal and civil cases. The Illinois Appellate Court found—affirmed by the Supreme Court of Illinois after argument by partner Matthew Carter—that the “expert testimony” provided by a television actor and retired law enforcement professional was improper because the witness had no medical qualifications to opine on the victim’s manner of death.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Matthew Carter

Libby Deshaies

Amelia Garza-Mattia

Matthew Carter

Libby Deshaies

Amelia Garza-Mattia

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising