small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Experience

Insight

Class Action Plaintiff Sent Packing After Winston Secures Enforcement of Binance’s Terms of Use

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Insight

Class Action Plaintiff Sent Packing After Winston Secures Enforcement of Binance’s Terms of Use

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

October 1, 2023

A Winston team secured a decisive victory for a major cryptocurrency exchange (and provided a potential roadmap for other online businesses seeking to enforce arbitration clauses in their terms of service) this week when a federal judge granted a motion to compel arbitration.

On September 11, 2023, Plaintiff Candice Wilhelm filed a putative class action in the Circuit Court of Cook County on behalf of all Illinois users who had created an account on Binance.US—a major cryptocurrency trading platform—in the five years preceding the suit. Wilhelm alleged that as part of the sign-up process, Binance.US and its parent company, BAM Trading Services, Inc., conducted facial scans of the users to verify their identities, in violation of certain provisions of the restrictive Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). Wilhelm sought statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation for each Illinois Binance.US users.

Winston removed the action to the Northern District of Illinois and moved to compel arbitration based on Binance.US’s Terms of Use, which contained a mandatory arbitration clause for any dispute arising out of an individual’s use of the website. Wilhelm responded by generally stating that she had no recollection of seeing the terms and that she did not agree to the arbitration provision.

The court accepted Winston’s arguments virtually wholesale, enforced the Terms of Use, and compelled arbitration. The court’s clear opinion offers strong support for other online businesses seeking to enforce their Terms of Use—particularly as to arbitration provisions.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Daniel T. Stabile

Sean G. Wieber

Whitney Adams

Jake A. Ferzacca

Patrick G. Simonaitis

Daniel T. Stabile

Sean G. Wieber

Whitney Adams

Jake A. Ferzacca

Patrick G. Simonaitis

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising

We, our service providers, and other third parties use cookies and other analytics, advertising, and tracking technologies on this site. Your information, including personal information and interactions with this site, may be monitored, recorded, or collected through these tools and further used or disclosed by us, our service providers, and authorized third parties. For more details, please visit our privacy policy.