small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

WacoWatch

    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • RSSRSS
Topics
Contributors
Start Date
End Date

Sort by:

7 results

April 3, 2025

|

2 min read

Judge Albright Awards Attorneys’ Fees, Finds Case Exceptional, and Holds Attorney Jointly and Severally Liable

In Silent Communication, LLC v. BlackBerry Corp., Case No. 6:22-cv-00252-ADA, Judge Albright partially granted BlackBerry’s motion for attorneys’ fees on February 25, 2025 (the Order).

...Read more

October 2, 2024

|

2 min read

Judge Albright Enters Judgment Despite Jury’s Disregard for Stop Instructions

On May 19, 2023, a Waco jury found that Dropbox did not infringe any of the patent claims asserted by Motion Offense, LLC.

...Read more

June 5, 2024

|

1 min read

Judge Albright Grants Micron’s Request To Amend Its Invalidity Contentions

On May 20, 2024, Judge Albright issued an order granting Micron Technology, Inc.’s (Micron) request to amend its invalidity contentions “to include U.S. Patent No. 7,397,713; U.S. Patent No. 7,174,440; and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0110343 as secondary references . . . to address [Sonrai Memory Limited’s (Sonrai)] new infringement theory” in Sonrai Memory Ltd. & Nera Innovations Ltd. v. Micron Technology, Inc., 1:23-cv-01407-ADA (W.D. Tex. May 20, 2024).

...Read more

September 13, 2023

|

2 min read

Magistrate Judge Gilliland Finds Improper Venue in Ice Rover v. Brumate, and Recommends a Transfer to Colorado in the Interest of Justice

On July 18, 2022, Ice Rover, Inc. (Plaintiff) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Brumate, Inc. (Defendant) in the Western District of Texas, Waco Division. Defendant filed a 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss the lawsuit for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 “in the interest of justice” to Colorado because it is a “district or division in which it could have been brought.”

...Read more

June 28, 2023

|

2 min read

PTAB Invalidates Two Patents Central To VLSI’s $2.2 Billion Verdict Against Intel From the Western District of Texas

On June 13, 2023, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a 35-page final written decision following inter partes review (IPR) between Patent Quality Assurance LLC (PQA), Intel Corp. (together, the petitioners), and VLSI Technology LLC (the patent owner).

...Read more

April 20, 2022

|

3 min read

Judge Albright Weighs Online Presence in Determining Whether Plaintiff Can Serve Process Electronically

In Sinox Co. v. YiFeng Manufacturing Co. and Shenzhen Yuandaoyuan Indus. Co., Sinox Co. (Sinox) sought the court’s permission to effect alternative service via email under Rule 4(f)(3). Judge Albright granted-in-part-as-modified and denied-in-part Sinox’s motion for leave to effect alternative service on defendants. He allowed electronic service upon Shenzhen Yuandaoyuan Indus. Co. (SYIC), but not YiFeng Manufacturing Co. (YiFeng), with the difference arising from each defendant’s online presence, or lack thereof.

...Read more

October 14, 2020

|

less than 1 min read

Trial Alert: MV3 v. Roku — Jury Trial Day 5

For Day 5, the defense rested its case-in-chief.

...Read more

About This Blog

Winston & Strawn’s WacoWatch series delivers information and analysis on Judge Alan Albright, his important decisions, his procedures, and emerging trends related to patent litigation in the Waco Division of the Western District of Texas.

Contributors

Thomas M. Melsheimer

Partner

Danielle Williams

Partner

Thomas B. Walsh

Partner

Mike Rueckheim

Partner

Michael Bittner

Partner

Brett Johnson

Partner

Rex Mann

Partner

Katrina Eash

Partner

Natalie Arbaugh

Partner

Kelly C. Hunsaker

Partner

Ahtoosa Amini Dale

Partner

William Logan

Partner

Evan Lewis

Associate

Related Capabilities

  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Litigation
  • Cryptocurrencies, Digital Assets & Blockchain Technology
  • Technology, Media & Telecommunications
  • Medical Devices

Get Our Updates

Subscribe

Related Insights & News

View All Insights & News
Client Alert
USPTO Releases Updated Guidelines for AI-Related Patent Eligibility

July 22, 2024

Recognitions
Susannah Torpey Named to Women We Admire's Top 50 Women Leaders in Technology of 2022

October 13, 2022

Article
Should Inventions Generated by AI Receive Patent Protection?

July 13, 2022

Blog
Judge Albright Weighs Online Presence in Determining Whether Plaintiff Can Serve Process Electronically

April 20, 2022

Blog
Patents Joining the Hot NFT Market?

November 3, 2021

Client Alert
Carving Out a Patented Indication from a Generic-Pharmaceutical Label Will Not Always Avoid Infringement

September 7, 2021

Client Alert
Eleventh Amendment’s Immunity Bars Coercive Joinder of a State Sovereign Patent Owner – But Exclusive Licensee’s Infringement Suit May Continue Independently

September 15, 2020

Client Alert
Burden Never Shifts to Patent Owner After Institution of IPR Proceedings

August 27, 2020

Client Alert
Whether a Patent Is “Essential” to Practicing an Industry Standard Is a Question of Fact, Not Law

August 26, 2020

Client Alert
Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Covers an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient—Including Any Salt or Ester of the Active Ingredient—but Does Not Encompass a Metabolite of the Active Ingredient or Its De-Esterified Form

April 21, 2020

In the Media
Can AIs Hold Patents? Kathi Vidal Weighs In with The Recorder

August 29, 2019

In the Media
Kathi Vidal Discusses First Artificial Intelligence Patent Filings with Law360

August 12, 2019

Client Alert
USPTO Releases Updated Guidelines for AI-Related Patent Eligibility
July 22, 2024
Recognitions
Susannah Torpey Named to Women We Admire's Top 50 Women Leaders in Technology of 2022
October 13, 2022
Article
Should Inventions Generated by AI Receive Patent Protection?
July 13, 2022
Blog
Judge Albright Weighs Online Presence in Determining Whether Plaintiff Can Serve Process Electronically
April 20, 2022
Blog
Patents Joining the Hot NFT Market?
November 3, 2021
Client Alert
Carving Out a Patented Indication from a Generic-Pharmaceutical Label Will Not Always Avoid Infringement
September 7, 2021
Client Alert
Eleventh Amendment’s Immunity Bars Coercive Joinder of a State Sovereign Patent Owner – But Exclusive Licensee’s Infringement Suit May Continue Independently
September 15, 2020
Client Alert
Burden Never Shifts to Patent Owner After Institution of IPR Proceedings
August 27, 2020
Client Alert
Whether a Patent Is “Essential” to Practicing an Industry Standard Is a Question of Fact, Not Law
August 26, 2020
Client Alert
Patent Term Extension Under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Covers an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient—Including Any Salt or Ester of the Active Ingredient—but Does Not Encompass a Metabolite of the Active Ingredient or Its De-Esterified Form
April 21, 2020
In the Media
Can AIs Hold Patents? Kathi Vidal Weighs In with The Recorder
August 29, 2019
In the Media
Kathi Vidal Discusses First Artificial Intelligence Patent Filings with Law360
August 12, 2019
View All Insights & News
Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising