small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

WacoWatch

    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • RSSRSS
Topics
Contributors
Start Date
End Date

Sort by:

2 results

November 15, 2022

|

2 min read

Judge Albright Orders Third-Party IPR Petitioner Unified Patents To Produce Member Lists and Communications With Members

On November 9, 2022, in Textile Computer Systems, Inc. v. Broadway National Bank d/b/a Broadway Bank, et al., Judge Albright denied non-party Unified Patents’ Motion to Quash subpoenas served by Plaintiff Textile Computer Systems, Inc. (“Textile”) on Unified Patents, LLC (“Unified Patents”).

...Read more

September 29, 2020

|

1 min read

Party Challenges (Unsuccessfully) Court’s Denial of Stay in View of IPR Institution – Mandamus Denied

Overcoming the fact that there was parallel litigation in the Western District of Texas, plaintiff Sand secured institution of an inter partes review (IPR) by stipulating in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings that Sand would not pursue the same invalidity grounds in the case before Judge Albright.

...Read more

About This Blog

Winston & Strawn’s WacoWatch series delivers information and analysis on Judge Alan Albright, his important decisions, his procedures, and emerging trends related to patent litigation in the Waco Division of the Western District of Texas.

Contributors

Thomas M. Melsheimer

Partner

Danielle Williams

Partner

Thomas B. Walsh

Partner

Mike Rueckheim

Partner

Michael Bittner

Partner

Brett Johnson

Partner

Rex Mann

Partner

Katrina Eash

Partner

Natalie Arbaugh

Partner

Kelly C. Hunsaker

Partner

Ahtoosa Amini Dale

Partner

William Logan

Partner

Evan Lewis

Associate

Related Capabilities

  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Litigation
  • Cryptocurrencies, Digital Assets & Blockchain Technology
  • Technology, Media & Telecommunications
  • Medical Devices

Get Our Updates

Subscribe

Related Insights & News

Blog
Board Denied Patent Owner’s Motion to Dismiss / Terminate IPR Following Patent Owner’s Withdrawal of Appeal of Parallel District Court Invalidity Finding

December 16, 2022

Blog
Federal Circuit Limits Use of “Admitted Prior Art” in IPR Proceedings

March 15, 2022

Blog
PTAB Engages in a § 112-Centric Analysis to Deny Institution

March 1, 2022

Blog
FWD did not cause § 315 estoppel for earlier filed petition

September 11, 2020

Blog
Precedential Opinion: Collateral agreements must be produced when requesting termination of IPR

September 10, 2020

Blog
Precedential Opinion: Contingent motion to amend providing nexus of amendments to secondary considerations of nonobviousness resulted in patentability

September 10, 2020

Blog
Precedential Opinion: PTAB may, in rare circumstances, raise a ground of unpatentability for proposed amended/substituted claims, that a petitioner did not advance, or insufficiently developed

September 10, 2020

Blog
Precedential Opinion: Board weighs six factors in discretionary denial analysis

September 9, 2020

Blog
Board Denied Patent Owner’s Motion to Dismiss / Terminate IPR Following Patent Owner’s Withdrawal of Appeal of Parallel District Court Invalidity Finding
December 16, 2022
Blog
Federal Circuit Limits Use of “Admitted Prior Art” in IPR Proceedings
March 15, 2022
Blog
PTAB Engages in a § 112-Centric Analysis to Deny Institution
March 1, 2022
Blog
FWD did not cause § 315 estoppel for earlier filed petition
September 11, 2020
Blog
Precedential Opinion: Collateral agreements must be produced when requesting termination of IPR
September 10, 2020
Blog
Precedential Opinion: Contingent motion to amend providing nexus of amendments to secondary considerations of nonobviousness resulted in patentability
September 10, 2020
Blog
Precedential Opinion: PTAB may, in rare circumstances, raise a ground of unpatentability for proposed amended/substituted claims, that a petitioner did not advance, or insufficiently developed
September 10, 2020
Blog
Precedential Opinion: Board weighs six factors in discretionary denial analysis
September 9, 2020
Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising