small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. MaritimeFedWatch

Blog

LNG Export U.S.-Flag Requirement Defeated in Congress

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

LNG Export U.S.-Flag Requirement Defeated in Congress

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Authors

Charlie PapavizasBryant Gardner

Related Locations

Washington, DC

Related Topics

Jones Act
U.S.-Flag Ships
LNG
U.S. Coast Guard

Related Capabilities

Maritime & Admiralty

Related Regions

North America

January 29, 2015

On January 28, 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives rejected an amendment offered by Rep. John Garamendi from California to require that U.S. LNG exports be carried in U.S.-built, U.S.-flag vessels if available. Presently, there are no LNG tank vessels under U.S.-flag that would precipitate the carriage requirement.

The amendment was offered to a bill intended to make it easier to obtain LNG export permission from the U.S. Government (H.R. 351, the “LNG Permitting Certainty and Transparency Act”). Rep. Garamendi had presented a similar amendment for consideration last year during committee consideration of the Coast Guard authorization bill. Rep. Garamendi argued that the U.S. build, U.S.-flag requirement was necessary for national defense (to support U.S. shipyards and U.S. merchant mariners) and for the preservation of American manufacturing and seagoing jobs. The vote was 237 to 175 against the amendment (with 21 not voting).

View the proposed bill here.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Charlie Papavizas

Bryant Gardner

Charlie Papavizas

Bryant Gardner

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising