small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. WacoWatch

Blog

Federal Circuit Clears VLSI and Intel Trial

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

Federal Circuit Clears VLSI and Intel Trial

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Authors

Danielle WilliamsThomas M. Melsheimer

Related Locations

Charlotte
Dallas
Los Angeles
Silicon Valley

Related Topics

Patent Litigation
Motions to Transfer
Jury Trial

Related Capabilities

Intellectual Property
Patent Litigation

Related Regions

North America

January 21, 2021

In re: Intel Corporation, 2021-111

The Federal Circuit denied Intel’s mandamus petition seeking to vacate Judge Albright’s order re-transferring the case from the Austin Division back to the Waco Division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). In a per curiam decision, the Federal Circuit acknowledged the Western District’s compliance with its December 2020 writ of mandamus order. The Western District assessed whether “‘unanticipated post-transfer events frustrated the original purpose for transfer’ of the case from Waco to Austin originally” and “concluded that it did and that re-transfer to Waco was warranted.” The court concluded that “[w]hile we may have evaluated these factors and the parties’ arguments differently, we are unable to say that the district court’s conclusion amounts to a clear abuse of discretion.”

Jury selection is on February 11, 2021 with trial set to begin on February 16, 2021 in Waco.

Read the Federal Circuit's order here. 

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Danielle Williams

Thomas M. Melsheimer

Danielle Williams

Thomas M. Melsheimer

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising