small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Insights & News

Client Alert

DOJ Antitrust Division Confirms Criminal “No Poach” Cases Expected Soon

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Client Alert

DOJ Antitrust Division Confirms Criminal “No Poach” Cases Expected Soon

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Locations

Charlotte
Chicago
Dallas
Houston
Los Angeles
New York
San Francisco
Silicon Valley
Washington, DC

Related Topics

Antitrust and Competition
U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division
Department of Justice (DOJ)

Related Capabilities

Antitrust/Competition

Related Regions

North America

January 23, 2018

The head of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, announced on January 19th that the Antitrust Division is currently working on criminal cases concerning so-called “no-poach” agreements in which companies agree not to hire each other’s employees. As Winston previously reported, the Antitrust Division announced a new policy in October 2016 putting companies on notice that it intended to proceed criminally against naked wage-fixing and no-poach agreements among employers. Specifically, the guidance informed HR personnel that “agreements among competing employers to limit or fix the terms of employment for potential hires may violate the antitrust laws if the agreement constrains individual firm decision making with regard to wages, salaries, or benefits, terms of employment, or even job opportunities.”

Delrahim’s Friday announcement dispelled speculation that this policy shift would not be pursued under the Trump administration. Delrahim further confirmed that conduct predating the 2016 policy announcement would still be pursued criminally if the activity continued since the time the new policy was announced. Delrahim noted that announcements concerning criminal no-poach cases could be coming within just a couple of months, adding that he has “been shocked about how many of these there are.”

Additional information pertaining the Antitrust Division’s October 2016 policy and potential criminal enforcement in this area can be found here. Should you have any questions concerning potential liability for wage-fixing of no-poach agreements or receive a subpoena, please contact one of the Winston attorneys list below.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Aldo A. Badini

Susannah Torpey

Aldo A. Badini

Susannah Torpey

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising