Professionals 105 results
Capabilities 27 results
Practice Area
Practice Area
Environmental Litigation & Enforcement
Industry
Experience 135 results
Experience
|May 2, 2025
Copley Acquisition Corp. Closes $172.5 Million Initial Public Offering
Experience
|April 23, 2025
Voyager Acquisition Corp. and VERAXA Biotech Announce Business Combination
Experience
|April 10, 2025
Titan Acquisition Corp Announces Closing of $276,000,000 Initial Public Offering
Insights & News 575 results
Seminar/CLE
|August 14, 2025
From Policy to Practice: Building Corporate AI Playbooks and Workflow
Tax Impacts
|July 31, 2025
|6 Min Read
On July 25, 2025, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS or Service) released an Interim Guidance Memorandum dated July 23, 2025 (the IGM) that i) eliminates the Acknowledgement of Facts (AOF) Information Document Requests (IDR) from Large Business & International Division (LB&I) examinations, ii) provides updates on the changes to the Fast Track Settlements (FTS) pilot program, and iii) clarifies the applicability of Accelerated Issue Resolution (AIR) to Large Corporate Compliance (LCC) cases.
Client Alert
|July 25, 2025
|8 Min Read
From Oversight to Omission: The OCC’s New Stance on Disparate Impact Liability
In this alert, Winston’s Financial Services Industry Group takes a closer look at the OCC’s new stance on disparate impact liability and its implications for the financial services industry.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced on July 14, 2025, that it will cease supervising banks for disparate impact liability, instructing its examiners to “no longer examine for disparate impact.”[1] Accordingly, OCC examiners will not request, review, conclude on, or follow up on matters related to a bank’s disparate impact related risk, risk analysis, or assessment processes or procedures.[2] The OCC also removed references to disparate impact liability from its fair lending examination manual.
This policy shift follows President Trump’s April 2025 executive order mandating the elimination of disparate impact liability across federal agencies and claiming that disparate impact liability forces companies to “engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.”[3] Given the Trump administration’s approach, the OCC’s policy shift is unsurprising. But the change means financial services companies should reconsider how they evaluate and address disparate impact risk, not only from the perspective of this revised federal regulatory lens, but also with the understanding that state attorneys general and private litigants will continue to pursue disparate impact claims as long as such claims remain legally viable.
What does this mean to you and your clients?
Other Results 15 results
Location
Site Content
What Is a Delaware Corporation?
Site Content