Professionals 423 results
Capabilities 83 results
Practice Area
Environmental Litigation & Enforcement
Practice Area
Derivatives & Structured Products
Practice Area
White Collar & Government Investigations
Experience 45 results
Experience
|December 23, 2024
Winston advises Atlantic Sustainable Catch in its acquisition of Atlantic Capes Fisheries
Experience
|November 23, 2024
Experience
|November 11, 2024
Insights & News 3,264 results
Government Program Fraud, False Claims Act & Qui Tam Litigation Playbook
|July 25, 2025
|4 Min Read
With the DOJ’s new directive to pursue denaturalization in civil healthcare fraud cases, naturalized citizens in leadership roles face heightened personal risk. Robust compliance and careful review of employment practices are more important than ever for healthcare organizations.
Client Alert
|July 25, 2025
|8 Min Read
From Oversight to Omission: The OCC’s New Stance on Disparate Impact Liability
In this alert, Winston’s Financial Services Industry Group takes a closer look at the OCC’s new stance on disparate impact liability and its implications for the financial services industry.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced on July 14, 2025, that it will cease supervising banks for disparate impact liability, instructing its examiners to “no longer examine for disparate impact.”[1] Accordingly, OCC examiners will not request, review, conclude on, or follow up on matters related to a bank’s disparate impact related risk, risk analysis, or assessment processes or procedures.[2] The OCC also removed references to disparate impact liability from its fair lending examination manual.
This policy shift follows President Trump’s April 2025 executive order mandating the elimination of disparate impact liability across federal agencies and claiming that disparate impact liability forces companies to “engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.”[3] Given the Trump administration’s approach, the OCC’s policy shift is unsurprising. But the change means financial services companies should reconsider how they evaluate and address disparate impact risk, not only from the perspective of this revised federal regulatory lens, but also with the understanding that state attorneys general and private litigants will continue to pursue disparate impact claims as long as such claims remain legally viable.
What does this mean to you and your clients?
In the Media
|July 24, 2025
|2 Min Read
Winston’s Digital Assets Lawyers Discuss the GENIUS Act with IFLR
Other Results 74 results
Law Glossary
What Is the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team?
Site Content
What Is the National Advertising Division (NAD)?