Site Search
Professionals 28 results
Capabilities 19 results
Practice Area
As society and business become even more digitalized, technology and intellectual property (IP) have become key focal points for businesses. Our Technology Antitrust Group combines the cross-practice and cross-office experience of our lawyers to assist clients in successfully navigating the dynamic convergence of technology, antitrust, and IP law. We understand the challenges presented by the ever-changing digital landscape and are committed to providing our clients with tailored solutions to address their specific needs.
Practice Area
Winston’s Intellectual Property (IP) Practice is one of the most active and highly regarded in the United States per Chambers USA, Benchmark Litigation US, and Best Law Firms®, among other ranking organizations. Our team features some of the country’s best IP lawyers, attorneys with the technical abilities to litigate and try highly complex IP disputes, and technical lawyers who provide critical advisory services.
Experience 2 results
Experience
|October 19, 2023
ISG Enterprises Acquisition of Apple
Represented ISG Enterprises, LLC in its acquisition of Apple. Apple is based in Mount Vernon, Alabama and provides installations, repairs, and maintenance services for industrial equipment.
Experience
|March 9, 2021
Siebert Williams Shank & Co. LLC US$250M Investment Fund for Clear Vision Impact Fund, LP
Winston & Strawn LLP represented Siebert Williams Shank & Co. LLC., as sponsor, general partner, and investment manager, in the formation of a US$250M investment fund known as Clear Vision Impact Fund, LP (“Clear Vision Impact Fund”), formed to enhance employment, job training, and the accessibility of educational opportunities in historically underserved communities by originating and making loans to, and investing in, small businesses that are minority- or women-owned or -operated, or that serve underperforming communities that have experienced a historical lack of capital to support economic growth. In a widely publicized deal, the initial limited partners of Clear Vision Impact Fund are Microsoft Corp., Apple Inc., eBay Inc., Comcast Corp., and Constellation Brands, which provided US$110M in capital commitments for Clear Vision Impact.
Insights & News 127 results
Article
|August 25, 2025
|7 Min Read
Adapting To USPTO’s Tighter Inter Partes Review Rules
This article was originally published in Law360. Any opinions in this article are not those of Winston & Strawn or its clients. The opinions in this article are the authors’ opinions only.
Competition Corner
|August 11, 2025
|6 Min Read
Epic v. Google: Setting the Bar for Affirmative Antitrust Remedies in the Digital Age
The July 2025 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Epic Games v. Google marks a landmark development in the ongoing evolution of antitrust remedies for unilateral conduct in the technology sector. The court’s willingness to affirm not just prohibitory, but also mandatory, forward-looking injunctions—requiring Google to take affirmative steps to open its Android app ecosystem to competition—signals a vigorous approach to restoring competition in digital platforms.
Client Alert
|August 5, 2025
|2 Min Read
USPTO Tightens IPR Petition Requirements
On July 31, 2025, the USPTO issued a memorandum announcing that, starting from September 1, 2025, it will interpret its own rule 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(4) as limiting the IPR grounds that can be brought before the Office. Congress provided the USPTO the authority under 35 U.S. Code § 312(a)(4) to promulgate regulations to require certain information in an IPR petition. Pursuant to this provision, the USPTO promulgated Rule 42.104(b)(4), which requires that the petition “specify where each element of the claim is found in the prior art patents or printed publications relied upon.” Though prior administrations applied this clause consistent with the Federal Circuit case law—recently reinforced in Shockwave—that although “only patents and printed publications form the basis of an IPR petition’s unpatentability grounds . . . [applicant admitted prior art] can be important evidence of general background knowledge, and general knowledge can be used to supply a missing claim limitation,” the USPTO is now interpreting its own regulation as not allowing applicant admitted prior art (AAPA) to supply missing claim limitations.
Other Results 13 results
Site Content
The Nasdaq is an electronic marketplace for buying and selling securities. Its name was originally an acronym for the “National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations”. Nasdaq started as part of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), now known as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Nasdaq was created after the Securities and Exchange Commission encouraged NASD to create an automated market for securities not listed on an exchange. The result was the first electronic trading system. Nasdaq opened in 1971 as the first electronic trading system. Nasdaq began to operate as a national securities exchange in 2006.
Location
Opened in 2017, Winston & Strawn’s Dallas office is located in the cultural and economic epicenter of DFW, the fourth largest metropolitan area in the U.S. and the fastest growing over the last year. Our Dallas attorneys litigate both high-stakes civil and criminal matters, including major state and federal trials and appeals nationwide, and represent clients in complex transactional matters. Under the leadership of Bryan L. Goolsby, our office—made up of nearly 100 lawyers—continues to expand, attracting some of the country’s top legal talent to meet the increased needs of the many technology, investment, and health care companies that are increasingly making Dallas their home.
Location
Launched in 2013, Winston & Strawn’s Silicon Valley office is home to nationally recognized attorneys that draw clients from Fortune 500 companies, startups, and everything in between. Led by Kelly Hunsaker—who has deep roots in Silicon Valley spanning nearly three decades—the office draws from the firm’s deep bench strength and global network of resources to serve clients in a variety of industries, including the semiconductor, computer hardware and software, telecommunications, life sciences, and pharmaceutical sectors. The office’s intellectual property attorneys have litigated extensively in all the top national patent litigation venues, as well as before the International Trade Commission and the Patent Trial and Appeals Board of the USPTO.