Professionals 476 results
Capabilities 77 results
Practice Area
Class Actions & Group Litigation
action lawyers, many of whom have been recognized by Chambers USA and other ranking organizations as being top practitioners in their field. Our clients
rely on us to steer them through class action matters by drawing on the firm’s significant experience in resolving complex litigation using creativ...Read more
Practice Area
Antitrust Group combines the cross-practice and cross-office experience of our lawyers to assist clients in successfully navigating the dynamic convergence
of technology, antitrust, and IP law. We understand the challenges presented by the ever-changing digital landscape and are committed to provi...Read more
Practice Area
Experience 117 results
Experience
|May 9, 2025
An Am Law LOTW Shout Out-Worthy Gold Medal Victory In $Jenner
Experience
|April 30, 2025
Experience
|April 30, 2025
Rapid Ruling: Fifth Circuit Affirms Winston Win on Summary Judgment the Day After Oral Argument
Insights & News 3,456 results
Client Alert
|July 24, 2025
|8 Min Read
From Oversight to Omission: The OCC’s New Stance on Disparate Impact Liability
In this alert, Winston’s Financial Services Industry Group takes a closer look at the OCC’s new stance on disparate impact liability and its implications for the financial services industry.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced on July 14, 2025, that it will cease supervising banks for disparate impact liability, instructing its examiners to “no longer examine for disparate impact.”[1] Accordingly, OCC examiners will not request, review, conclude on, or follow up on matters related to a bank’s disparate impact related risk, risk analysis, or assessment processes or procedures.[2] The OCC also removed references to disparate impact liability from its fair lending examination manual.
This policy shift follows President Trump’s April 2025 executive order mandating the elimination of disparate impact liability across federal agencies and claiming that disparate impact liability forces companies to “engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.”[3] Given the Trump administration’s approach, the OCC’s policy shift is unsurprising. But the change means financial services companies should reconsider how they evaluate and address disparate impact risk, not only from the perspective of this revised federal regulatory lens, but also with the understanding that state attorneys general and private litigants will continue to pursue disparate impact claims as long as such claims remain legally viable.
What does this mean to you and your clients?
Government Program Fraud, False Claims Act & Qui Tam Litigation Playbook
|July 24, 2025
|4 Min Read
With the DOJ’s new directive to pursue denaturalization in civil healthcare fraud cases, naturalized citizens in leadership roles face heightened personal risk. Robust compliance and careful review of employment practices are more important than ever for healthcare organizations.
Pro Bono In Action
|July 24, 2025
|1 Min Read
Winston Rebuffs Appeal & Will Pursue Damages for Immigrants Unlawfully Held by Suffolk County
unreasonable search and seizures when it extended the detention of individuals in response to ICE detainer requests. (Read more here.)
Other Results 78 results
Law Glossary
classes) to file suit on behalf of a group of similarly situated persons. Federal law defines a class action as “any civil action filed under Rule 23 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative pers...Read more
Law Glossary
Actions filed in state court over which a federal court would have original jurisdiction may be transferred—or removed—to federal court under the removal
statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Generally speaking, removal is possible if (1) the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) are citizens of different states and the cas...Read more
Law Glossary
designs that create misleading impressions, hide or delay disclosure of material information, lead to unauthorized charges, or obscure privacy choices. Some
examples include advertisements deceptively formatted to look like independent editorial content; non-descriptive dropdowns, arrows, or small i...Read more