Bradley D. Coburn
Partner
Bradley is a trial lawyer focused on patent litigation and other intellectual property disputes. While he practices nationwide, he has deep, longstanding experience in the Western District of Texas, where he clerked in the Austin Division for the former Chief Judge. He has been recognized repeatedly as a Texas Super Lawyer.
Key Matters
Some of the experience represented below may have been handled at a previous firm.
District Court Actions
- Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc., et al. (W.D. Tex. 2021) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- TurboCode LLC v. HP, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2021) – Defend electronics manufacturer, HP, in patent infringement suit
- Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2020) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- Caddo Systems, Inc. v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2020) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- Far North Patents, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2020) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- PayPal Inc. v. RetailMeNot Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2020) – Defend online retail technology company, RetailMeNot, against patent infringement claims
- Heritage IP LLC v. Insulet Corp. (D. Del. 2020) – Defend medical device manufacturer against patent infringement claims
- NXP USA, Inc. v. Heritage IP LLC (D. Del. 2020) – Prosecute DJ claims on behalf of semiconductor manufacturer, NXP
- Freshub, Inc., et al v. Amazon.Com Inc., et al. (W.D. Tex. 2019) – Defend online retailer, Amazon, in patent infringement suit
- Bell Semiconductor LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- Vantage Micro LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- Circuit Ventures v. NXP USA, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019) – Defend semiconductor manufacturer, NXP, against patent infringement claims
- Frantz Design Inc. v. Diamond Orthotic Laboratory LLC, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2019) – Represent medical device maker in prosecuting trademark infringement claims
- Think Operations, LLC v. Top Shelf Barber Supplies, LLC (W.D. Mich. 2019) – Represent consumer goods company in prosecuting trademark infringement and breach of contract claims
- MyMail, Ltd. v. HP, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018) – Defend electronics manufacturer, HP, in patent infringement suit
- Axcess Int’l, Inc. v. AMAG Technology, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2016) – Defend seller of access control and surveillance technologies in patent infringement suit
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Springpath, Inc. (D. Mass. 2015) – Represent enterprise software company, HPE, in asserting patent infringement claims
- Trover Group, Inc., et al v. USA Vision Systems, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2014) – Defend U.S. subsidiary of Taiwanese electronics company in patent infringement suit
- Wickfire, LLC v. Trimax Media, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2014) – Represent performance search engine marketing company, Wickfire, LLC, in prosecuting federal false designation of origination, business disparagement, defamation, and tortious interference with contract action
- Waves Audio, Ltd et al. v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al. (N.D. Cal. 2013) – Represent GRAMMY® Award-winning audio technology company, Waves Audio, in trademark infringement action
- Rotatable Techs, Inc. v. Blastro, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2013) – Defend online music video service, Blastro, Inc., against patent infringement claims
- Entorian Techs., Inc. v. Polystak, Inc. & Fusion-IO, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2012) – Represent chipmaker Entorian Technologies in patent infringement action against competing companies
- Ah Ha Publishing, LLC v. Mark Herer, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jack Herer (W.D. Tex. 2012) – Defend copyright holder against declaratory judgment action on contract claims; prosecute copyright infringement claims on behalf of copyright holder
- 2010 MFI, LLC and Robert McDonald, III v. STC.UNM, Inc., et al. (W.D. Tex. 2012) – Represent inventor and related entity in declaratory judgment of ownership of patent rights and theft of trade secrets action
- E-Contact Techs., LLC v. Liquid Web, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2012) – Defend server hosting company, Liquid Web, Inc., against patent infringement claims
- Cecilio Musical Instruments v. Austin Bazaar, Inc., et al. (W.D. Tex. 2011) – Defend online musical instrument retailer, Austin Bazaar, Inc., against trademark infringement and trademark counterfeiting claims
- Keen v. Marek, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2011) – Defend hydroponics technology companies and principals in patent litigation. Favorable settlement including transfer of asserted patent to client. Also included successful judgment in companion state court suit involving trade secret issues, among others.
- Positive Technologies, Inc. v. Sony Electronics, Inc., et al. (N.D. Cal. 2011) – Represent pioneering inventor of display technologies in patent infringement action
- Keen v. Global Garden Supply, LLC, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2011) – Defend hydroponics company against patent infringement claims
- DDB Techs., LLC v. Prestosports, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2011) – Defend e-commerce and web analytics solutions provider, Prestosports, Inc., against patent infringement claims
- Microsoft Corp. v. Serhal-TEK, LLC et al. (W.D. Tex. 2010) – Defend online refurbished computer hardware retailer, Serhal-TEK, LLC, against copyright and trademark infringement claims
- Prophet Capital Management Ltd. v. Prophet Equity, LLC (W.D. Tex. 2009) – Defend investment fund, Prophet Equity, LLC, against trademark infringement claims
- Crossroad Sys., Inc. v. Digilink Tech., Inc., et al. (W.D. Tex. 2009) – Defend online computer hardware and software product retailer, Digilink Technology, Inc., against patent infringement claims.
- Tompkins v. Able Planet, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2009) – Defend manufacturer/retailer of toxin-safe baby and sports products, Thinkbaby, Inc., against patent false marking claim
- Progressive Concepts, Inc. v. Hawk Electronics, Inc. (N.D. Tex. 2008) – Assert trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition claims on behalf of electronics components manufacturer/wholesaler/retailer
- 3N Global, Inc. v. Zimmers, et al. (C.D. Cal. 2008) – Defend 3N Global, Inc. against patent infringement claims
- Polaroid Corp. v. Hewlett–Packard Company (D. Del. 2007) – Defend Hewlett-Packard Company against patent infringement claims
- The Heisman Trophy Trust v. Triton Financial, LLC, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2007) – Assert trademark infringement and dilution claims on behalf of The Heisman Trophy Trust
- Multimedia Patent Trust (Lucent) v. Microsoft Corp. (S.D. Cal. 2006) – Defend Microsoft against patent infringement claims and prosecute patent infringement counterclaims on behalf of same
- Silicon Svcs. Consortium, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2006) – Defend Applied Materials against antitrust claims and assert patent infringement counterclaims on behalf of same
- Diagnostic Sys. Corp. v. Motive, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal. 2006) – Defend Motive, Inc. against patent infringement claims
- Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., et al. (S.D. Cal. 2003) – Defend Microsoft against patent infringement claims
Section 337 Proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission
- Certain Audio Processing Hardware and Software and Products Containing the Same (Investigation No. 337-TA-949) – Represented audio hardware and software providers as Respondent and Intervenor, respectively, where Complainant alleged infringement of five patents relating to audio input processing software.
- Certain Noise Cancelling Headphones (Investigation No. 337-TA-626) – Represented audio technology company enforcing active noise-canceling headphone patents against seven respondents.