small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Insights & News

Client Alert

Relying on the Preamble to Defeat a § 101 Challenge Makes It Limiting

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Client Alert

Relying on the Preamble to Defeat a § 101 Challenge Makes It Limiting

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

2 Min Read

Author

James Lin

Related Locations

Charlotte
Chicago
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Silicon Valley

Related Topics

Section 13
Patent Litigation
Patent Infringement

Related Capabilities

Patent Litigation
Intellectual Property

October 26, 2021

Data Engine Technologies LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2021-1050 (Fed. Cir. August 26, 2021)

This is a second appeal to the Federal Circuit in a case regarding three asserted patents directed to systems and methods for displaying and navigating three-dimensional electronic spreadsheets by implementing user-customizable “notebook tabs” on the spreadsheet interface. Prior to this second appeal, the alleged infringer had filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) that the patentee’s asserted claims were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The district court held the asserted claims to be ineligible under § 101. The patentee appealed the decision, and the Federal Circuit agreed with the patentee’s argument that the “key innovation” of the asserted patents was a particular manner of navigating three-dimensional spreadsheets by providing a user-friendly interface with familiar notebook tabs. In a footnote, the Federal Circuit noted that claim 1 of one of the three asserted patents was affirmed as ineligible under § 101.

Subsequent to the first appeal, the alleged infringer requested the district court to reopen claim construction and construe the preamble term “three-dimensional spreadsheet.” The district court agreed with the alleged infringer that the preamble is limiting and construed the term “three-dimensional spreadsheet” as “spreadsheet that defines a mathematical relation among cells on different spreadsheet pages, such that cells are arranged in a 3-D grid.” The district court also granted the alleged infringer’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement because it was undisputed that the alleged infringer’s accused product is not a “three-dimensional spreadsheet,” as construed by the district court.

The patentee filed this second appeal arguing that the preamble term “three-dimensional spreadsheet” is not limiting and thus does not have patentable weight. The Federal Circuit disagreed with the patentee and affirmed the district court’s decision. The Federal Circuit found that where the patentee relies on language found in the preamble, such as “three-dimensional spreadsheet,” to successfully argue that its claims are directed to eligible subject matter, it cannot later assert that the preamble term has no patentable weight for purposes of showing infringement. In addition, the Federal Circuit adopted the district court’s construction of “three-dimensional spreadsheet” that requires a mathematical relation because it found that the patentee expressly included “a mathematical relation” in its definition of “three-dimensional spreadsheet” to distinguish the claimed invention over prior art in the prosecution history.

Because the patentee did not argue that the accused product infringes under the district court’s construction, summary judgment of noninfringement was affirmed.

Read the full decision here.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

James Lin

David Enzminger

Ivan Poullaos

Mike Rueckheim

Danielle Williams

James Lin

David Enzminger

Ivan Poullaos

Mike Rueckheim

Danielle Williams

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising

We, our service providers, and other third parties use cookies and other analytics, advertising, and tracking technologies on this site. Your information, including personal information and interactions with this site, may be monitored, recorded, or collected through these tools and further used or disclosed by us, our service providers, and authorized third parties. For more details, please visit our privacy policy.