small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Insights & News

Client Alert

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Alleged Hub-and-Spoke MAP Conspiracy

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Client Alert

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Alleged Hub-and-Spoke MAP Conspiracy

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Locations

Charlotte
Chicago
Houston
Los Angeles
New York
San Francisco
Silicon Valley
Washington, DC

Related Topics

Antitrust and Competition
MAP
Text Message

Related Capabilities

Antitrust/Competition
Litigation/Trials

Related Regions

North America

September 29, 2015

In a decision some may view as creating a Circuit split with the Second Circuit’s recent e-Books decision, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the Southern District of California’s decision in In re: Musical Instruments and Equipment Antitrust Litigation, dismissing a complaint alleging that guitar manufacturers entered into a hub-and-spoke conspiracy with an instrument retailer to implement minimum-advertised-price (“MAP”) policies. Unlike the e-Books Court, which credited evidence of the parallel adoption of vertical agreements, a common economic motive, and price effects in support of a per se unlawful hub-and-spoke conspiracy, the Ninth Circuit held that the alleged common adoption of MAP policies that coincided with higher retail prices did not merit per se analysis as a hub-and-spoke conspiracy. The Ninth Circuit drew a distinction between the allegations in this case and those asserted in in re Text Messaging, which is likewise applicable to e-Books, in noting that plaintiffs did not allege that defendants simultaneously changed to a uniform pricing structure and then raised their prices.

The decision is also significant because it is one of the few published decisions dealing with MAP policies. Although the Ninth Circuit declined to hold that adoption of the MAP policies was sufficient to support an inference of an agreement among the guitar manufacturers, the court left open the possibility that the conduct at issue could violate the antitrust laws. Specifically, the court noted that the retailer’s use of “its substantial market power to pressure each manufacturer to adopt similar policies, and each manufacturer[’s] adopt[ion] [of] those policies” “may be anticompetitive – and perhaps even violate the antitrust laws.” A copy of the decision can be found here.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Jeffrey Kessler

Susannah Torpey

Jeffrey Kessler

Susannah Torpey

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising