small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Winston’s Environmental Law Update

Blog

FWS Moves Toward Permitting Scheme for Unintentional Bird Kills

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

FWS Moves Toward Permitting Scheme for Unintentional Bird Kills

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Locations

Chicago
Washington, DC

Related Topics

Species

Related Capabilities

Environmental Litigation & Enforcement

February 18, 2015

On February 10, 2015, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) notified the White House Office of Management and Budget of its plans to move forward with the creation of a permitting scheme that would allow for the unintentional taking of migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA).

The MBTA was first enacted in 1918 and makes the “kill[ing]” or “tak[ing]” of a migratory bird, nest, or egg unlawful. “Take,” for the purposes of the Act, means to “pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” In some jurisdictions, “take” has also come to mean activities that may inadvertently cause the death of a migratory bird, including the construction and operation of wind turbines, as well as other industrial activities. Currently, the Act is inconsistently enforced, with some circuit courts holding that the MBTA does not apply to incidental takings from commercial activities and other circuits upholding criminal liability for incidental takings. The proposed permitting scheme could offer consistency that both environmental groups and industry actors would find appealing.

The Office of Management and Budget has not yet approved the FWS’ plan. 

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising