small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Winston’s Environmental Law Update

Blog

EPA Re-Proposes Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power Plants

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

EPA Re-Proposes Carbon Pollution Standards for New Power Plants

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Locations

Chicago
Washington, DC

Related Topics

Energy
Rulemaking
Climate Change

Related Capabilities

Environmental

Related Regions

North America

September 20, 2013

On September 20, 2013, EPA re-proposed greenhouse gas ("GHG") emission standards for new power plants. The rule was previously proposed in April 27, 2012, but due to numerous legal flaws with the rule, EPA went back to the drawing board to arrive at a new proposal. This time, the Agency has proposed two different standards for coal- and natural gas-fired units. The new proposed GHG limits for fossil fuel-fired utility boilers and IGCC units are as
follows:      

  • 1,100 lb CO2/MWh gross over a 12-operating month
    period, or       
  • 1,000-1,050 lb CO2/MWh gross over an 84-operating month (7 year) period. 

Both of these limits will require carbon capture.

For natural gas-fired stationary combustion units, two different limits have been proposed, depending on the size of the unit:

  • 1,000 lb CO2/MWh gross of larger units (? 850 mmBtu/hr)
  • 1,100 lb CO2/MWh gross for smaller units (= 850 mmBtu/hr)

Comments will be accepted by EPA for 60 days after publication of the rule in the Federal
Register
.

Although EPA claims to have proposed different standards, the standards are really the same, and will require new coal-fired power plants to use carbon capture and sequestration, an untested technology that is not yet commercially available. As a result, we expect industry to raise many of the same legal challenges to the new proposal, as were raised against EPA's prior version.

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising