small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Winston’s Environmental Law Update

Blog

EPA Asks D.C. Circuit to Reconsider CSAPR Vacatur

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

EPA Asks D.C. Circuit to Reconsider CSAPR Vacatur

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Topics

Court Decisions
Air

Related Capabilities

Environmental

October 8, 2012

On October 5, 2012, EPA filed a petition seeking a rehearing en banc of the D.C. Circuit’s decision to vacate CSAPR on August 21, 2012. In its petition, EPA relied heavily on Judge Judith Rodgers’ dissent, arguing that the D.C. Circuit lacked jurisdiction to determine that the States were not required to submit transport SIPs unless EPA had first defined their level of significant contribution. EPA also argued that the petitioners had waived arguments presented to the court by not first raising them during the public comment period.

In order for EPA’s petition for a rehearing en banc to be granted, a judge must first call for a vote, and a majority of circuit judges in regular active service and who are not disqualified must vote in favor of granting EPA’s petition for a rehearing en banc. Rehearings on banc are disfavored and rarely granted. It appears unlikely that the D.C. Circuit will grant EPA’s request for a rehearing en banc because the case is specific to CSAPR and a rehearing is not necessary to maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions. In addition, the judges may find that the proceeding does not involve a question of exceptional importance. A decision on EPA’s petition is not expected until after the November election.

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising