small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Winston’s Environmental Law Update

Blog

Environmental Groups Challenge Regional Haze Plans in Wake of CSAPR Vacatur

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

Environmental Groups Challenge Regional Haze Plans in Wake of CSAPR Vacatur

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Related Topics

Air

Related Capabilities

Environmental

October 24, 2012

In recent weeks, Sierra Club and other environmental organizations have filed petitions for review in four federal appellate courts seeking review of regional haze SIPs and FIPs in ten states that relied on CSAPR, which was found to violate the Clean Air Act in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA. EPA had previously determined that the CSAPR trading program satisfies the BART requirements under the Regional Haze Rule. The environmental groups argued in their petitions for review that since CSAPR has been vacated, states can no longer rely on CSAPR to satisfy the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule.

The environmental groups have filed petitions for review challenging the regional haze SIPs and FIPs in the following states: Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Although the lawsuits are currently pending in four federal appellate courts, the environmental groups have indicated that they believe the appropriate forum for litigation is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and that they intend to file petitions for review of the regional haze FIPs and SIPs in that court as well.

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising