small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. WacoWatch

Blog

Judge Albright’s Latest Changes to Case Management and Discovery Hearings

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

Judge Albright’s Latest Changes to Case Management and Discovery Hearings

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Authors

Danielle WilliamsMarisa Thompson, Summer Associate

Related Locations

Charlotte

Related Topics

Discovery
Patent Infringement

Related Capabilities

Patent Litigation

Related Regions

North America

June 23, 2021

Judge Albright issued two new standing orders on June 16 and 17, 2021, which are now published on the Western District of Texas website here and here.

Here are the highlights:

Proposed Orders After Discovery Hearings: Judge Albright now requires the prevailing party in discovery hearings to submit an agreed proposed order to the Court within 7 days of the ruling. The agreed proposed order should include a brief summary of the nature of the dispute and the parties’ understanding of the Court’s ruling. The parties may submit competing proposed orders if they cannot agree.

Case Management and Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases: Judge Albright amended his prior standing order regarding notice of readiness for patent cases. With the changes to the timeline, the parties will not be waiting on information from the Court before the OGP deadlines can take effect. The new order lays out the following timeline after the filing of the Case Readiness Status Report:

  • The CMC is deemed to occur 14 days after the filing date of the CRSR (or the last CRSR if there are related cases).
  • The Court will schedule one Markman hearing 23 weeks after the CMC, and the hearing date should be included in the proposed scheduling order.

The new order also defines “CRSR Related Cases” as cases “filed within thirty (30) days after the first case is filed” and “shar[ing] at least one common asserted patent.”

In addition, for any pre-Markman issues, the parties should email the Court a joint submission of their respective positions after filing the CRSR so the Court can determine whether to hold a telephonic hearing.

Marisa Thompson is a summer associate in the firm’s Dallas office. She received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame and is expected to receive her J.D. from SMU Dedman School of Law in 2022.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Danielle Williams

Danielle Williams

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising

We, our service providers, and other third parties use cookies and other analytics, advertising, and tracking technologies on this site. Your information, including personal information and interactions with this site, may be monitored, recorded, or collected through these tools and further used or disclosed by us, our service providers, and authorized third parties. For more details, please visit our privacy policy.