small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. WacoWatch

Blog

Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directing Judge Albright To Vacate Order Denying Transfer

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directing Judge Albright To Vacate Order Denying Transfer

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Authors

Michael BittnerTyler Boyce

Related Locations

Dallas
Houston

Related Capabilities

Intellectual Property
Patent Litigation

Related Regions

North America

January 24, 2023

VoIP-Pal.com has been engaged in patent litigation against Amazon in a number of different cases since 2018, including the instant case filed in June of 2021. Amazon filed a Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of California on November 19, 2021, asserting that the location of 28 of its employees in the Northern District of California weighed heavily in favor of transfer, as well as the presence of five non-party witnesses who could be compelled to the Northern District of California.

Judge Albright denied the Motion, owing largely to the fact that an ex-Amazon employee submitted a declaration that he oversaw a 40-person team in the Western District of Texas whose work related to the accused functionality of the accused products. Plaintiffs had also identified three non-party witnesses who could be compelled to testify in the Western District of Texas. Judge Albright further found that it could likely hold a trial sooner than if the case were transferred, and on balance found that Amazon had failed to show the transferee venue was clearly more convenient.

Amazon subsequently petitioned the Federal Circuit, which noted that the standard to establish its right to relief was a clear abuse of discretion that produced a patently erroneous result. The panel went on to find that Judge Albright considered all of the relevant factors, and that none of the findings were clearly erroneous. As such, on January 9, 2023, the court declined the petition and the case will not be transferred.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Michael Bittner

Tyler Boyce

Michael Bittner

Tyler Boyce

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising