small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Privacy & Data Security

Blog

E-Health Company Settles with FTC Over Privacy Disclosures

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

E-Health Company Settles with FTC Over Privacy Disclosures

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

2 Min Read

Author

Alessandra Swanson

Related Locations

Chicago

Related Topics

Health Care Privacy
Consumer Privacy
Online Privacy

Related Capabilities

Privacy & Data Security
Health Care

Related Regions

North America

July 6, 2016

Practice Fusion, Inc., an e-health records company, recently agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charges over privacy allegations regarding its patient review website. According to the FTC complaint, Practice Fusion hoped to populate a new website with responses from surveys it emailed to consumers who had recently visited their doctors. The surveys appeared to have come from the doctors (“sent on behalf of Doctor [XXX] by: Practice Fusion”) for the doctor’s purposes, namely as a “tool Doctor [XXX] uses to deliver the highest quality of care to patients.” Of particular concern, the company did not make it clear that the surveys consumers filled out would be publicly posted on the website (not used for the doctor’s purposes), in violation the FTC alleged of Section 5 of the FTC Act.

In filling out a review, consumers could rank (among other things) doctors’ bedside manner, wait time, as well as whether or not their medical concern was addressed. These questions were followed with a free-form text box, which directed consumers not to leave “any personal information.” Before submitting this information, customers had to agree to a “patient authorization,” but did not need to view it. If they had, they would have seen a disclosure that the individual was authorizing the doctor and Practice Fusion to post the review online. Reviews were collected for a year before the site went live, so consumers would not have seen how the content they submitted might be viewed. Given these factors, the FTC alleged, consumers were likely to believe the information they submitted would be private. Indeed, in this text box, the FTC indicated in its complaint, consumers provided confidential health information, including information about removed warts, chemo treatment, and the like, which information was subsequently posted online in connection with both the doctor and the patient’s names.

As part of the proposed  FTC settlement, Practice Fusion agreed to make clear and conspicuous disclosures separate and apart from its privacy policy that information being submitted would be posted publicly and get affirmative consent.

TIP: Companies that permit individuals to post information online should take care to ensure it is clear that information submitted will be publicly posted. This is particularly true when individuals using the website or service might submit sensitive information like medical or financial information.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Alessandra Swanson

Alessandra Swanson

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising