small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Privacy & Data Security

Blog

$66 Million Trade Secret Verdict in California

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

$66 Million Trade Secret Verdict in California

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Author

Steven Grimes

Related Locations

Chicago

Related Topics

Trade Secrets
Data Breach

Related Capabilities

Privacy & Data Security
Trade Secrets, Non Competes & Restrictive Covenants

Related Regions

North America

August 17, 2018

Last week, a California jury awarded Lumileds LLC, an LED light developer, $66 million after finding that the Chairman of Elec-Tech International Company recruited a now-former Lumileds engineer to steal five types of Lumiled’s trade secrets and bring them to Elec-Tech. The engineer copied thousands of files containing Lumiled’s trade secrets and other information to a portable storage device before moving to China and beginning to work for Elec-Tech. According to the complaint, the engineer had been in discussions with Elec-Tech about a potential job nearly a year before he left his position at Lumileds, and once he joined Elec-Tech, the company began selling an LED product in an “unprecedented” amount of time.

While Elec-Tech argued that it independently developed its technology, the $66 million figure verdict reflected how much the jury determined Elec-Tech would have spent on research and development had it not possessed Lumiled’s trade secrets. The jury did not find that any of the defendants (the engineer, Elec-Tech, or its Chairman) acted “willfully and maliciously” when misappropriating Lumiled’s trade secrets.

Notably, in 2015, a federal court dismissed a Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim Lumileds previously asserted based on the same conduct, because among other things, Lumiled’s engineer had been authorized to access the information he allegedly stole, and Lumiled’s could not base a claim on “indirect” access by Elec-Tech’s Chairman.

TIP: Trade secret laws offer powerful protection and may provide avenues for legal remedies, including large damages judgments, that other laws will not.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Steven Grimes

Steven Grimes

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising