small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Privacy & Data Security

Blog

California Jury Awards More Than $220 Million in Trade Secret Theft Case, with over $1 Million to Cover Costs Spent Investigating the Theft

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

California Jury Awards More Than $220 Million in Trade Secret Theft Case, with over $1 Million to Cover Costs Spent Investigating the Theft

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Author

Steven Grimes

Related Locations

Chicago
Los Angeles

Related Topics

Trade Secrets
Data Breach

Related Capabilities

Privacy & Data Security
Trade Secrets, Non Competes & Restrictive Covenants
Technology, Media & Telecommunications

Related Regions

North America

December 17, 2018

On November 28, 2018, a California jury awarded the U.S. branch of a Dutch semiconductor maker, ASML, $223 million in its suit against a local rival, XTAL, for misappropriating trade secrets. Finding that XTAL also violated provisions of California’s computer fraud statute, the jury ordered XTAL to pay an additional $1.2 million to compensate ASML for its investigation expenses.

According to the complaint, XTAL induced multiple ASML employees to work for XTAL while they were still employed by ASML and induced those employees to copy ASML’s trade secret information onto hard drives for XTAL’s benefit. After AMSL filed suit, the court required XTAL to surrender computers, source code, and other devices for inspection, which included evidence of ASML’s information. ASML contended that XTAL was able to bring its lithographic technology to market remarkably quickly—and even managed to take one of ASML’s customers—because it used ASML’s trade secrets. As a result, the jury found that XTAL had misappropriated ASML’s trade secrets and awarded ASML $223 million. Because the jury also deemed XTAL’s conduct malicious, the judge may now also order punitive damages and attorneys’ fees under California’s trade secret statute.

Having found XTAL also violated California’s computer fraud statute, the jury awarded ASML an additional $1.2 million in compensatory damages as reimbursement for ASML’s investigation expenses.

TIP: Theft of trade secrets can require a costly investigation and cause significant damage to the victim-company and, if proven, can result in large civil judgments. This case illustrates that investigative costs, actual damages, and potentially punitive damages are recoverable by the victim.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Steven Grimes

Steven Grimes

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising