small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Competition Corner

Blog

China’s New Merger Review Regime

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

China’s New Merger Review Regime

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Author

Kevin B. Goldstein

Related Locations

Chicago

Related Topics

Antitrust Intelligence
M&A
China

Related Capabilities

Antitrust/Competition
Antitrust Transactions

Related Regions

North America

July 29, 2022

China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) was significantly amended in June 2022, with changes taking effect August 1, 2022. Businesses contemplating mergers, acquisitions, or joint ventures should be aware of changes to China’s premerger notification requirements and substantially increased penalties for failure to file a required notification. These changes can affect any transaction where the parties derive sufficient turnover from China, regardless of whether the parties have any assets or physical presence in China. 

In a new FAQ on the AML amendments affecting merger reviews, Winston and YuandaWinston antitrust attorneys in the U.S. and China answer common questions about how the amended AML and accompanying new draft standards proposed by China’s antitrust enforcement agency, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), will affect transactions by non-Chinese companies that sell products into China or whose business may be considered to impact Chinese domestics markets. Issues addressed in the FAQ include:

  • The extent of China’s extraterritorial jurisdiction to conduct antitrust review of transactions that occur outside China
  • New thresholds for within-China turnover triggering mandatory premerger notification
  • Forthcoming guidelines from the SAMR to clarify the AML amendments
  • Increased penalties for “gun jumping,” the failure to notify SAMR of reportable transactions
  • Statistics on how frequently Chinese antitrust enforcers have imposed conditions on mergers

Guidance from experienced antitrust counsel is always recommended at an early stage of any contemplated deal to evaluate where premerger filings may be required and to navigate the risks. With these AML amendments, Chinese antitrust law continues to evolve and demonstrate that China expects its antitrust enforcers to review any transactions—inside or outside China—that may have a significant effect on domestic Chinese commerce. 

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Kevin B. Goldstein

Kevin B. Goldstein

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising

We, our service providers, and other third parties use cookies and other analytics, advertising, and tracking technologies on this site. Your information, including personal information and interactions with this site, may be monitored, recorded, or collected through these tools and further used or disclosed by us, our service providers, and authorized third parties. For more details, please visit our privacy policy.