Class Action Insider
Topics
Contributors
Sort by:
1 result
January 31, 2022
|4 min read
Kim Kardashian’s compensated reference to a certain cryptocurrency may have been the most widely seen financial promotion in history, as observed by an industry expert. But is she liable to a putative class of investors who took her advice and lost money?
Related Insights & News
Blog
SEC Hosts Roundtable with Crypto Task Force on Tokenization
May 29, 2025
Blog
SEC Dismisses Enforcement Action Against Coinbase; Staff Issues Guidance on Meme Coins
March 5, 2025
Blog
European Parliament Endorses the New Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)
April 26, 2023
Blog
Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets in the United States – The White House
October 7, 2022
Blog
Crypto-Assets: Implications for Consumers, Investors, and Businesses – U.S. Department of the Treasury
October 7, 2022
Blog
SEC Chair Warns of Increased Enforcement and Oversight of Crypto Assets
November 10, 2021
Article
2020: The Year of EU Crypto-Asset Regulation
June 2, 2020
Client Alert
2020: The Year of EU Regulation of Crypto-Assets?
January 10, 2020
Blog
When It Comes to Analyzing Utility Tokens, the SEC Staff’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” May Be the Emperor Without Clothes (Or, Sometimes an Orange Is Just an Orange) (Part IV)
December 18, 2019
Blog
When It Comes to Analyzing Utility Tokens, the SEC Staff’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” May Be the Emperor Without Clothes (Or, Sometimes an Orange Is Just an Orange) (Part III)
November 26, 2019
Blog
When It Comes to Analyzing Utility Tokens, the SEC Staff’s “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” May Be the Emperor Without Clothes (Or, Sometimes an Orange Is Just an Orange) (Part II)
November 6, 2019





