small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Capital Markets & Securities Law Watch

Blog

SEC Signs Off on NASDAQ Family Relationship Definition Changes

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

SEC Signs Off on NASDAQ Family Relationship Definition Changes

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Authors

Michael J. BlankenshipJ. Eric JohnsonBen D. SmolijJohn P. Niedzwiecki

Related Locations

Houston

Related Topics

Independence
Board of Directors
Interested Party
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Related Capabilities

Transactions
Capital Markets
Financial Services

Related Regions

North America

February 13, 2020

On February 13, 2020, the SEC approved, on an accelerated basis, the Nasdaq’s proposed rule change amending the definition of “family member” to exclude stepchildren who do not share a director’s home and domestic employees who reside in a director’s home for purposes of determining director independence under Nasdaq Rule 5065(a)(2).

Under the new Nasdaq rule, a “family member” will be defined to be a person’s “spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who share such person’s home.” The Nasdaq’s interpretation of the new rule would exclude stepchildren, unless they share the director’s home, reflecting the reality that the old rule was often over-inclusive when determining a director’s independence. These changes bring the Nasdaq’s family definition in line with the NYSE’s interpretation of a “family relationship” for purposes of determining a director’s independence.

Boards of Directors should continue to ask questions about stepchild relationships in its D&O questionnaires, because companies will still need to make independence judgments based on the facts and circumstances of each unique director-stepchild relationship.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Michael J. Blankenship

J. Eric Johnson

Ben D. Smolij

John P. Niedzwiecki

Michael J. Blankenship

J. Eric Johnson

Ben D. Smolij

John P. Niedzwiecki

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising