small-logo
ProfessionalsCapabilitiesInsights & NewsCareersLocations
About UsAlumniOpportunity & InclusionPro BonoCorporate Social Responsibility
Stay Connected:
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube
  1. Benefits Blast

Blog

Wilderness Therapy—Two More Victories for Health Insurers

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page
  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

Blog

Wilderness Therapy—Two More Victories for Health Insurers

  • PDFPDF
    • Email
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share this page

1 Min Read

Author

Amy Gordon

Related Locations

Chicago

Related Capabilities

Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Insurance

Related Regions

North America

December 19, 2018

In our recent blog posting we reported Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc. and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.’s partial victory in support of its denial in covering wilderness therapy treatment. Two additional insurers have also succeeded in similar lawsuits.

In Meyers v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan Inc., No. 17-CV-04946-LHK, 2018 BL 458488 (N.D. Cal. December 11, 2018), the court held that Kaiser did not have to cover a $68,825 bill for a teenager’s four-month stay at a wilderness therapy facility. The plaintiff’s alleged that the teenager’s stay was based on the emergency services provision in the plan. The Judge treated Kaiser’s denial of benefits with judicial deference, and upheld Kaiser’s denial. The takeaways from this case is the importance of the plan’s language and following the Plan’s procedures in order to obtain deference from the court.

In a second lawsuit, H.H. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 9:18-cv-80773-DMM (S.D. Fla. December 13, 2018), the court held that Aetna did not have to cover wilderness therapy programs in Colorado and Utah for troubled teens. Two sets of parents sought to recover $45,105 and $28,500 they each paid for their children’s stay at the facilities. The plaintiffs failed to provide evidence that the wilderness programs attended to treat mental health issues are residential treatment facilities that meet the specific requirements to be covered Aetna’s insurance plan. 

There are still a number of these cases pending against numerous insurers and group health plans. We will continue to keep you apprised of how these cases unfold.

Related Professionals

Related Professionals

Amy Gordon

Amy Gordon

This entry has been created for information and planning purposes. It is not intended to be, nor should it be substituted for, legal advice, which turns on specific facts.

Logo
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutube

Copyright © 2025. Winston & Strawn LLP

AlumniCorporate Transparency Act Task ForceDEI Compliance Task ForceEqual Rights AmendmentLaw GlossaryThe Oval UpdateWinston MinutePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyFraud & Scam AlertsNoticesSubscribeAttorney Advertising