Winston & Strawn LLP
 
 

Special Alert

Email Print
Advanced Search divider News divider Events divider Publications
Related Professionals
Friedman, Michael
DiBenedetto, Joseph
Sibarium, Michael
Rothstein, Ronald
Heidelberger, Brian
Reed, Mary
Durchslag, Stephen
Fergemann, Brian
Richard, Virginia
Bridges, Andrew
Golinveaux, Jennifer
Thomas, Liisa
Bloch, David
Atlee, Steven
Mello, H. Joseph
Lane, Thomas
Elkin, Michael
Bhargava, Monique
Eckhart, Kimberly
Aronoff, David
Gordon, Jason
Trachtenberg, Marc
Newman, Robert
Related Services
Advertising, Marketing, Promotions
Advertising Copy Clearance
Advertising Challenges and Litigation
Sweepstakes and Promotions
Intellectual Property
Trademark/Copyright Litigation
Trademark/Copyright Counseling
Litigation
Privacy and Security
Related Industries
Media, Internet and Advertising
March 2, 2010
Free Speech Defense by Game Maker Over Alleged Violation of College Football Player’s Right of Publicity Is Rejected on Motion to Dismiss

The Northern District of California recently denied Electronic Art's motion to dismiss a right of publicity claim brought against it by former college football player Sam Keller. The dispute was over the use by EA of Keller's college jersey number, physical characteristics, and other identifiers (such as home state) in EA's NCAA Football video game. EA argued that its use of Keller's likeness was a defensible violation of Keller's right of publicity under two different First Amendment arguments: (a) that the use was transformative; and/or (b) that it was merely publishing matters in the public interest (i.e., reporting newsworthy information). In finding that the use was not transformative, the court noted that when looking at the use of Keller's likeness,rather than the game as a whole, EA has shown Keller "as what he was: the starting quarterback for Arizona State University." In finding that the use was not merely news reporting, the court distinguished from fantasy football games (where use of player stats has been found to be protected under the First Amendment). In particular, unlike a fantasy football game where the reporting on the actual facts is necessary for a participant's success in the fantasy football game, in NCAA Football, a video game player's success was not dependent on the real-life facts. Moreover, the court noted, EA had provided more than just the bare facts, but had also included other elements, such as the college and university players' physical characteristics and home states.

TIP: If you are considering using a celebrity's name or likeness in your advertisement, take care if you believe that your use is protected by the First Amendment as such a defense is quite limited. 

 
 
Home Offices Contact Site Map Client Login Alumni Legal PRIVACY POLICY