Maritime and Admiralty

RSS Feed Email Print
Share
View divider Overview divider Attorneys divider Matters divider a-maritimefedwatch.gif divider PDF Version
Practice Contacts
Charlie Papavizas
T: +1 (202) 282-5732 | Email

 

Practice Areas
Maritime and Admiralty
Maritime Environmental Crimes
Government Contracts
Maritime Litigation
Topics
allision   APT   ballast water   bankruptcy   Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement   Coast Guard   Coast Guard Act   Department of Interior   ECA   energy   environmental crimes   EPA   False Claims Act   FMC Rules   highway bill   IMO   Jones Act   MARAD   maritime arbitration   Maritime Labour Convention   maritime liens   maritime security program   Maritime Transportation Act   MARPOL   MOU   Navigation and Inspection Circular   OFAC   offshore drilling   petroleum   piracy   ship mortgages   taxes   U.S. Coast Guard   vessel  
Other Winston & Strawn Blogs
MARITIME FEDWATCH
About the Bloggers
Blog Tools Recent Postings | All Postings | Power Search | Attorney Login
July 2, 2012 icon
Congress Enacts Anti-Cargo Preference Provision in Highway Bill

On June 29, 2012, the U.S. Congress completed its work on a multi-year transportation authorization known as the “highway bill” which included at the last instant an anti-cargo preference provision. Cargo preference refers to a set of laws and policies whereby the U.S. Government reserves certain of its cargoes for privately owned U.S.-flag commercial vessels. The anti-cargo preference provision reduces the percentage of international food-aid (PL 480) cargoes reserved to such vessels from 75 percent to 50 percent. This reduction reverses a 1985 bipartisan compromise between maritime and agricultural interests where the percentage was increased to 75 percent in exchange for cargo preference not applying to certain U.S. Government agricultural export programs.


Topics
highway bill

Charlie Papavizas ; Bryant Gardner
Email comments to the authors