Winston & Strawn LLP
 
 

Executive Compensation

Email Print
View divider Overview divider Attorneys divider Matters divider a-ecblog.gif divider PDF Version
Practice Contacts
Michael Melbinger
T: +1 (312) 558-7588 | Email
Practice Areas
Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
Employee Retirement and Pension Plans
ERISA Litigation
Executive Compensation
Health and Welfare Benefits
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BLOG
Blog Tools Recent Postings | All Postings | Power Search | Attorney Login
August 14, 2009
IRS Internal Memo on 162(m) and Backdated Options

Although the feds continue to prosecute a few officers and directors who back-dated stock options and plaintiffs' lawyers continue their cases against the directors and corporations, the press generally seems to have lost interest in the topic. However, I thought I should mention one final coda to the whole fiasco from the Interal Revenue Service (IRS). In Internal Memo, AM 2009-006, the IRS concluded that a stock option whose exercise price was less than the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant ("discounted stock option") does not, and could not be modified to, qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Sec. 162(m)(4)(C), where the executive reimburses the employer for the excess of the fair market value on the date of grant over the exercise price (or the parties otherwise agree to an increased exercise price).

The IRS also reaffirmed its position, consistent with that of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that the grant date of a stock option is the date the granting corporation completes the corporate action constituting an offer of sale to an individual of a certain number of shares of stock at a fixed price per share.

No big surprise here.



Michael S. Melbinger
Email comments to author
 
 
Home Offices Contact Site Map Client Login Alumni Legal PRIVACY POLICY