Advertising, Marketing & Privacy Law Practice

RSS Feed Email Print
Share
View divider Overview divider Attorneys divider Matters divider a-ampblog.gif divider PDF Version

The five lead attorneys in the group collectively have practiced in this area for more than 100 years.

Practice Areas
Advertising, Marketing & Privacy Law Practice
Advertising and Entertainment Disputes
Advertising & Promotions Counseling
Advertising & Promotions Transactions
Sweepstakes and Promotions
Privacy and Data Security
Technology Transactions, Licensing, and Outsourcing
Copyright Litigation
Trademark Litigation
Resource Center
Topics
advertising   behavioral advertising   cause marketing   CFPB   children   COPPA   copyright   deceptive advertising   domain names   false advertising   FDA   FDA regulations   FTC   game of chance   gaming   gift cards   gift certificate   misappropriation   mobile applications   NAD   online behavioral advertising   patent marking   privacy   promotions   public domain   publicity   search engine ads   social media   sweepstakes and contests   telemarketing   text message   trademark   trademark and unfair competition   UDRP  
Other Winston & Strawn Blogs
ADVERTISING, MARKETING & PRIVACY LAW NEWS
Welcome to the blog hosted by Winston & Strawn’s Advertising and Promotions Law practice group. In this blog, we cover news regarding recent developments in advertising, promotions, entertainment, and privacy law, as well as practical implementation tips and lessons learned from the cases discussed. To learn more about any of the cases or issues covered, please don’t hesitate to contact one of us or your regular Winston contact. To subscribe to these updates, please see the RSS icon at the top right of the page.
About the Bloggers
Blog Tools Recent Postings | All Postings | Power Search | Special Alerts | Attorney Login
May 17, 2012
Marketing Company Agrees to Stop Spamming Facebook Users

The Washington Attorney General recently entered into a consent decree with Adscend Media LLC prohibiting the online marketing company from sending "spam" social networking communications. The AG's office had sued Adscend for a program where a Facebook user was allegedly tricked into  "liking" certain Adscend-created Facebook pages, which inadvertently spread the sales pitches to their Facebook friends. In addition, the users could not actually access the information they had attempted to view without providing personal information or signing up for services. Under the consent decree "commercial electronic messages" as regulated under CAN-SPAM are defined to include messages in social networks that were posted on a wall, in a news feed, or on other similar pages. In other words, a regulated communication according to the decree is not just one sent to a user's in-network inbox. Facebook had also sued Adscend in California, arguing that its activities violate CAN-SPAM. The Facebook litigation settled earlier this month. Under the settlement reached with the Washington AG, Adscend has agreed to pay $100,000 in attorneys' costs and fees.

TIP: Messages sent on social networking platforms such as Facebook may be subject to CAN-SPAM requirements. Note that under CAN-SPAM actions can be brought by regulators or the platforms themselves. Companies engaging in marketing activities on these sites should thus review their practices carefully to ensure they are compliant.



Monique N. Bhargava ; Liisa M. Thomas
Email comments to the authors