Advertising, Marketing & Privacy Law Practice

RSS Feed Email Print
Share
View divider Overview divider Attorneys divider Matters divider a-ampblog.gif divider PDF Version

The five lead attorneys in the group collectively have practiced in this area for more than 100 years.

Practice Areas
Advertising, Marketing & Privacy Law Practice
Advertising and Entertainment Disputes
Advertising & Promotions Counseling
Advertising & Promotions Transactions
Sweepstakes and Promotions
Privacy and Data Security
Technology Transactions, Licensing, and Outsourcing
Copyright Litigation
Trademark Litigation
Resource Center
Topics
advertising   behavioral advertising   cause marketing   CFPB   children   COPPA   copyright   deceptive advertising   domain names   email marketing   false advertising   FDA   FDA regulations   FTC   game of chance   gaming   gift cards   gift certificate   misappropriation   mobile applications   NAD   online behavioral advertising   patent marking   privacy   promotions   public domain   publicity   search engine ads   social media   sweepstakes and contests   telemarketing   text message   trademark   trademark and unfair competition   UDRP  
Other Winston & Strawn Blogs
ADVERTISING, MARKETING & PRIVACY LAW NEWS
Welcome to the blog hosted by Winston & Strawn’s Advertising and Promotions Law practice group. In this blog, we cover news regarding recent developments in advertising, promotions, entertainment, and privacy law, as well as practical implementation tips and lessons learned from the cases discussed. To learn more about any of the cases or issues covered, please don’t hesitate to contact one of us or your regular Winston contact. To subscribe to these updates, please see the RSS icon at the top right of the page.
About the Bloggers
Brian L. Heidelberger
Partner
Chair, Advertising, Marketing and Promotions Practice
Chicago Office
Blog Tools Recent Postings | All Postings | Power Search | Special Alerts | Attorney Login
November 9, 2011
Online Advertiser Settles with FTC for use of Flash Cookies without Adequate Disclosure

The Federal Trade Commission recently settled with ScanScout, a video advertising network that serves targeted advertising through the use of online behavioral advertising methods.  According to the FTC, ScanScout utilized Flash cookies to collect and store user data rather than using traditional HTTP cookies. Unlike HTTP cookies, consumers cannot control Flash cookies through their computer browser's and changing browser settings to delete or block cookies do not affect Flash cookies. The FTC alleged that ScanScout's privacy policy contained a general statement that consumers could opt-out of receiving cookies by changing your browser setting to prevent the receipt of cookies, which was false or misleading with respect to ScanScout's use of Flash cookies. The settlement consent order requires ScanScout to disclose on their websites and advertisements, that they collect information through Flash cookies and directly link consumers to the mechanism allowing them to opt-out of targeted advertisements, and such opt-out would remain in effect for at least five years unless the user opts-in again.

TIP: Flash cookies use different technology than traditional HTTP cookies. If using Flash cookies to collect and store user information, at a minimum, advertisers should ensure that their privacy policy clearly discloses that Flash cookies are used and provide specific directions to the user about how to disable and delete Flash cookies. In light of recent class actions against companies utilizing Flash cookies, advertisers may wish to assess whether to use Flash cookies in lieu of HTTP cookies.



Monique N. Bhargava ; Brian L. Heidelberger
Email comments to the authors